Page 161 - UCSSW - UCS Sales Workshop
P. 161

UCS Competitive Assets

         Title         Date   Key Headline                                                              URL

Cisco UCS vs. HP for   Q2 10  A commissioned report from Enterprise Management Associates (EMA)         http://www.cisco.com/en/US/so
energy and management  Q2 11  that studies how Cisco UCS's management capabilities and Unified          lutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/n
                              Computing System are key, to effective and efficient server power         s224/ns944/ema_cisco_data_cent
 Cisco UCS - A Real    Q4 10  savings and increased data center capacity compared to HP                 ermgmt0610.PDF
 World TCO Analysis           BladeSystem.
                       Q1 11
 UCS VDI: Scaling      Q1 11  EMA analyzed the business value realized by a large number of Cisco       http://www.cisco.com/en/US/so
 Without Sacrifice     Q2 11  customers and found that Cisco customers that choose to invest in UCS     lutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/n
                              stand an excellent chance of extracting significant, quantifiable         s224/ns944/cisco_ucs_areal_worl
 VDI Perfromance              business value within a relatively short period of time while increasing  d_tco_analysis.pdf
 Comparison UCS B250          overall responsiveness, performance, business agility and availability
 M2 vs. HP BL460C G7          of critical business applications.

 UCS B250 M2 Deploy           Partner with Intel, Citrix and NetApp; Organizations deploying a          http://www.cisco.com/en/US/so
 47% Faster vs. HP            desktop virtualization solution benefit by using servers that support     lutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/n
 BL460C G7                    many users and properly scale with additional servers. A single Cisco     s224/ns944/ucs_vdi_scaling_with
 UCS B250 M2 Deploy           UCS B250 M2 Extended Memory Blade Server running Citrix                   out_sacrifice.pdf
 47% Faster vs. HP            XenDesktop® 4 with Citrix XenServer 5.6 supported 112 MS Win 7
 BL460C G7 - VIDEO            virtual desktops and scaled perfectly, without sacrificing
                              performance, supporting 784 virtual desktops when adding six more
                              blades as measured by Login VSI Beta3 parameters.

                              Using LoginVSI Beta3 benchmark with Citrix XenDesktop 4 and               http://www.cisco.com/en/US/so
                              XenServer 5.6 on NetApp storage, Cisco Unified Computing System           lutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/n
                              B250 M2 supported 112 virtual desktops with 2GB memory vs. 93 for         s224/ns944/Vdi_Performance_Co
                              the HP BL460c G7. The UCS B250 M2 delivered 20.4% more virtual            mparision.pdf
                              desktops per blade than the HP solution.

                              Head to Head, Cisco UCS with UCS Manager deploys blades 47% faster        http://www.cisco.com/en/US/so
                              that HP Virtual Connect Enterprise Manager (and FlexFabric), with 67%     lutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/n
                              fewer steps.                                                              s224/ns944/ucs_vs_hp_deployme
                                                                                                        nt.pdf

                              VIDEO: Head to Head, Cisco UCS with UCS Manager deploys blades            http://www.youtube.com/watch?
                              47% faster that HP Virtual Connect Enterprise Manager (and                v=nijWlNzSgCQ
                              FlexFabric), with 67% fewer
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162