Page 120 - Fundamentals of Management Myths Debunked (2017)_Flat
P. 120

•  A “rational” decision maker . . .
                                Should Be:                                Can Ever Be?

                                Fully objective and logical               Can we ever be fully objective and logical?


                                Problem is clear and                      Can problems ever be totally clear
                                unambiguous                               and unambiguous?

                                Clear and specific goal                   Can a goal ever be made that clear
                                regarding decision                        and specific?


                                All possible alternatives                 Can all possible alternatives and
                                and consequences known                    consequences ever be known?

                                Alternative selected maximizes            Can any alternative ever really do that?
                                likelihood of achieving goal


                                Organization’s best interests             Managers should do this but may face
                                are considered                            factors beyond their control.


                                           Rationality is not a very realistic approach.

                        2          Bounded Rationality






                                   “A. More. Realistic. Approach.”

                                   •  bounded rationality: Managers make rational decisions, but are limited (bounded) by
                                       their ability to process information. 13
                                   •  Most decisions managers make don’t fit the assumption of perfect rationality.

                                   •  No one can possibly analyze all information on all alternatives so they . . .
                                   •  satisfice—that is, accept solutions that are “good enough,” rather than spend time and

                                       other resources trying to maximize. (See From Past to Present box on p. 120.)

                                         Example: As a newly graduated finance major, you look for a job as a
                                                      financial  planner—minimum salary of $55k, and within
                                                    100 miles of your hometown.  After searching  several
                                                      different options, you accept a job as a business credit an-
                                                     alyst at a bank 50 miles away at a starting salary of $52k.
                                                     HOORAY! If, however, you’d  maximized—that is, con-
                                                     tinued to search all possible alternatives—you’d have
                                                     eventually  found  this  financial  planning  job  at  a  trust   bounded rationality
                                                      company 25 miles away with a starting salary of $57k.   Making decisions that are rational within the limits
                                                      However, the first job offer was  satisfactory—“good   of a manager’s ability to process information
                           iQoncept/Fotolia  within the bounds of your abilities to process information!  satisfice
                                       enough”—and you took it! Your decision making was still rational . . . but
                                                                                                  Accepting solutions that are “good enough”


                                                                                                                        119
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125