Page 153 - Binder2

Cotabish, A., Dailey, D. Robinson, A. & Hunghes, G., (2013). The Effects of a STEM Intervention on
Elementary Students' Science Knowledge and Skills. School Science and Mathematics,
113(5), 215226 .

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches. Sage publications.

Czerniak, C. M., Weber Jr, W. B., Sandmann, A., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and
mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421430.

De Leo–Winkler, M. A., Canalizo, G., & Wilson, G. (2016). Astrophotography, a portal for engaging
nonSTEM majors in science. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 20.

Deater‐Deckard, K., Chang, M., & Evans, M. E. (2013). Engagement states and learning from
educational games. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2013(139),
2130.

Demir, E. B. K., Caka, C., Tugtekin, U., Demir, K., Islamoglu, H., & Kuzu, A. (2016). Threedimensional
printing applications in Turkey. Ege Education Journal, 17 (2), 481503.

Druger, M. (2006). Experiential learning in a large introductory biology course. In J. J. Mintzes & W. H.
Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 37–43). Arlington, VA:
National Science Teachers Association Press.

Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2017). From seeing to observing: How parents and children learn to see
science in a botanical garden. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26, 608–642.

Eguchi, A. (2016). RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological
advancement through robotics competition. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75,
692699.

Erman, E. (2017). Factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in learning covalent bonds. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 520537.

Eyisi, Daniel 2016 The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in
Researching Problem Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of
Education and Practice 7(15): 91–100.

Farrel, D., Ray, K., Rich, T., Suarez, Z., Christenson, B., & Jennigs, L. (2018). A MetaAnalysis of
Approaches to Engage Social Work Students Online. Journal of Teaching in Social
Work, 38(2), 183197.

Ferreira, A. (2018). Enhancing understanding of conceptual relationships in introductory mechanics
(Doctoral dissertation, NorthWest University).

Fortney, V. J. (2016). An exploration of factors that influence student engagement in science (Doctoral
dissertation, Southern Connecticut State University).

Fredericks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept,
state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59109.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P.
(2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and
mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 84108415.

Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for
Teacher Education. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science & technology education,
3.)3(

Gelfand, A. E., Smith, A. F., & Lee, T. M. (1992). Bayesian analysis of constrained parameter and
truncated data problems using Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical
Association, 87(418), 523532 .

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation
questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.

436