Page 154 - Binder2

2030

Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A
theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1088–
1107 .

Gonzales, L. (2016). Extracurricular activities and the effect on student achievement. Texas A&M
UniversityCommerce.

Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
(STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

Hadley, E. B., Dickinson, D. K., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Nesbitt, K. T. (2016). Examining the
acquisition of vocabulary knowledge depth among preschool students. Reading
Research Quarterly, 51(2), 181198.

Halim, A., Yusrizal, Y., Susanna, S., & Tarmizi, T. (2016). AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’SKILL IN APPLYING
THE PROBLEM SOLVING STRATEGY TO THE PHYSICS PROBLEM SETTLEMENT IN FACING
AEC AS GLOBAL COMPETITION. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 15.

Hall, A., & Miro, D. (2016). A Study of Student Engagement in Project‐Based Learning Across Multiple
Approaches to STEM Education Programs. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6),
310319.

Halupka, V. (2016). Augmented reality in engineering education: Current status and future
opportunities. In 27th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for
Engineering Education: AAEE 2016 (p. 320). Southern Cross University.

Halverson, L. R. (2016). Conceptualizing Blended Learning Engagement.
Hauze, S., & French, D. (2018, March). Predictors of success in applied STEM education through Guitar

building. In Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2018 IEEE (pp. 6569). IEEE.
Highfield, K. (2010). Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving.
Hinde, E. T. (2005). Revisiting curriculum integration: A fresh look at an old idea. The social studies,

96(3), 105111.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K12 education: Status,

prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press.https://doi.org/10.1007/9789400743045.
Huitt, W. (1992). Problem solving and decision making: Consideration of individual differences using
the MyersBriggs Type Indicator. Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 3344 .
Ibáñez, M. B., & DelgadoKloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review.
Computers & Education.
Ince, E. (2018). An Overview of Problem Solving Studies in Physics Education. Journal of Education and
Learning, 7(4), 191.
Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., Samsudin, M. A., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2017). SelfEfficacy, Scientific
Reasoning, and Learning Achievement in the STEM ProjectBased Learning Literature.
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures
of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 727.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research
and development, 48(4), 6385 .
Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I., & Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in
online learning environments: the role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research
and Development, 65(1), 203218.
Kaufmann, H. (2004). Geometry education with augmented reality. na.
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technologybased
teaching and learning. Educational technology, 38(5), 2023.
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary
education preservice teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers
& Education, 91, 1431.

437