Page 156 - Binder2
P. 156

2030

National Center for Education Statistics. (2015, January 1). Condition of Education 2015. Retrieved

from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015144.pdf

National Science Board (2010). NSB report: Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators

Retrieved                                                            from

<http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsb1033.>

Nayak, A. K., & Rao, V. K. (2002). Classroom teaching: Methods and practices. APH Publishing
                   Corporation.

Nemiro, J., Larriva, C., & Jawaharlal, M. (2017). Developing creative behavior in elementary school
                   students with robotics. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(1), 7090.

Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states
                   by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Noe, R. A., Tews, M. J., & Marand, A. D. (2013). Individual differences and informal learning in the

workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 327–335. http://dx.doi.

org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.009

Ogle, T. (2004). Racing to Success: Using Professional 3D Design Software to Build CO [2]Powered Cars

in Middle School Science. In the CurriculumTechnology/Education/Science. Learning

& Leading with Technology, 31(5), 2234.

Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980). A technique for exploring students' views of the world. Physics

Education, 15(6), 376 .

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent

developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 14.

Palmquist, S. D., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: How parents talk to novice and expert
                   children in a natural history museum. Science Education, 98, 783–804.

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2018). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from

http://www.p21.org/aboutus/p21frameworkþ

Radu, I. (2012, November). Why should my students use AR? A comparative review of the educational

impacts of augmentedreality. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2012 IEEE

International Symposium on (pp. 313314). IEEE.

Reddy, M., & Panacharoensawad, B. (2017). Students ProblemSolving Difficulties and Implications in

Physics: An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors. Journal of Education and Practice,
8(14), 5962.

Reys, R. E., Suydam, M. N., Lindquist, M. M., & Smith, N. L. (1998). Helping Children Learn Mathematics
                   (5th ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon .

Riskowski, J. L., Todd, C. D., Wee, B., Dark, M., & Harbor, J. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of an

                   interdisciplinary water resources engineering module in an eighth grade science
                   course. International journal of engineering education, 25(1), 181.
Salyers, F., & McKee, C. (2007). The young adolescent learner. Annenberg Media .

Sansone, B. C. (2014). Evaluating Educators' Perceived Value of Augmented Reality in the Classroom.

Union University.

Schulz, R. M. (2014). Philosophy of education and science education: A vital but underdeveloped

relationship. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science
teaching (pp. 12591316). Springer, Dordrecht.

Sha, L., Schunn, C., & Bathgate, M. (2015). Measuring choice to participate in optional science learning

experiences during early adolescence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5),

686709.

Shahali, M., Hafizan, E., Halim, L., Rasul, S., Osman, K., Ikhsan, Z., & Rahim, F. (2015). BITARASTEM

TRAINING OF TRAINERS'PROGRAMME: IMPACT ON TRAINERS'KNOWLEDGE, BELIEFS,

ATTITUDES AND EFFICACY TOWARDS INTEGRATED STEM TEACHING. Journal of Baltic
Science Education, 14.)1(

                                                                                                          439
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161