Page 83 - Binder2
P. 83

Discussion and conclusion

             The present study investigated the effectiveness of e-learning in undergraduate
     physical therapy students along with their perceptions about e-learning. Results
     suggested that an e-learning platform is an effective platform in teaching physical
     therapy courses. Possible benefits of using e-learning to teach physical therapy are
     revealed by these following points: student’s perceptions towards e-learning are
     excellent and the entire e-learning course stimulated their desire to learn, helpful in
     improved interactions between peer groups and even instructors though. The majority
     of students accepted that they are satisfied with the online lecture notes which are easy
     to print. Especially, they preferred the PowerPoint which is available in e-learning.
     Students responded that the JUMP website is a great place to place handouts by their
     instructors. The students are very much satisfied with the individual features of the
     JUMP system.

             Even though many students accepted e-learning as an effective means of
     teaching physical therapy courses, they feel some subjects should be taught by hybrid
     courses that involve both online and traditional facetoface classes. In physical therapy,
     most of the courses need practical and handson teaching instead of complete theoretical.
     And we have to note that the majority of them want to have a class which meets in
     person than online. Online learning improved their grades when compared to their
     traditional classroom teaching which proves that the student’s satisfaction is overall
     excellent while learning online. The majority of students (47%) expressed that the
     internet connection was poor during online learning.

     Table 3: Electrotherapy II (204PHT)The subject is having both
                        theory and practical sections.

     Grade distribution (204PHT)  Percentage of students  Second semester
                                  Second semester         2019.
     A+                           2018.
     A                                                    3.85%
     B+                           3.44 %                  3.85%
     B                            3.44 %                  11.53%
     C+                           13.79 %                 30.77%
     C                            20.68 %                 11.53%
     D+                           24.13 %                 26.92%
     D                            20.68 %                 7.69%
     F                            10.34 %                 3.85%
     Withdrawn
                                  3.44 %

366
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88