Page 314 - Tzurba M'Rabanan Volume1
P. 314

312 · Hilchot Leil Haseder I                                       Tzurba M’Rabanan


        hold that the nature of the mitzva is not just to tell  the other Tannaim in Bnei Brak. 15
        the story and praise Hashem, but also to focus on   From Rabbeinu Yonah’s words  it seems that
                                                                              16
        the halachot of Pesach, and in order to do this,  he holds that both elements are true, namely that
        one has to have lucidness and cannot be inebri-  the nature of the mitzva of sippur yetziat mitzray-
        ated in any way (more than the four cups that the  im includes learning the halachot of Pesach as well
        Sages instituted).                        as the story, and the scope extends until the morn-
          The Griz  explains that the Torah speaks to us  ing, and does not apply only during the meal. Ac-
                  12
        in two different fashions: One is by way of story  cordingly, even if one has completed the meal, we
        and narrative, and the other is by way of mitzv-  are still concerned that a person should not be-
        ot, chukim and halachot. He parallels these two  come drunk, as the obligation of learning hilchot
        elements with the makeup of the Haggada and  Pesach is still incumbent upon him until dawn.
        concludes explicitly that the mitzva of sippur yet-  When clarifying the opinion of the Rashbam
        ziat mitzrayim on the Seder night includes both  we are left slightly in the dark. As mentioned pre-
        aspects: There is an obligation to tell the story of  viously, he states that the reason for not drinking
        yetziat mitzrayim as well as an obligation to ex-  between the cups is lest one becomes inebriated
        plain the practical mitzvot of the night.  and is unable to recite Hallel. Arguably, after Hal-
          On the other hand, the Rishonim who permit  lel is recited on the fourth cup, he might not have
        drinking the fifth cup understand that the focus  a problem of adding a fifth cup. This is how the
        of the mitzva of sippur yetziat mitzrayim is trans-  Ba’al Hamaor understood his opinion. On the
        mitting the story in any form, and if one wants to  other hand, the Rashbam earlier in his commen-
        drink and tell it while inebriated, one still fulfills  tary brings another reason for not drinking in be-
        the obligation. 13                        tween the third and fourth cup  that it looks as
                                                                            17
                                                  if one is adding onto the cups instituted by the
        The Scope of the Mitzva                   Sages. This reason might apply even after the end
        Another understanding of the machloket is that it  of the Seder. Alternatively, there might not be a
        revolves around the scope of the mitzva. Accord-  problem of adding once the Seder has ended. Yet
        ing to those who permit drinking, the mitzva is  another possibility is that the Rashbam would ac-
        only until the latest possible time one can partake  tually agree with Rabbeinu Yonah as we have ex-
        of the matza and maror.  However, according to  plained him above.
                            14
        Rabbeinu Yonah, the obligation exists the entire
        night until the morning, as mentioned in the Ge-  The Opinion of the Ran and Rambam
        mara  and  Haggada  regarding  Rabbi  Akiva  and   Revisited


        12.  Chidushei HaGriz Hachadashim, Siman 37
        13.   See for example Rambam, Sefer HaMitzvot 157, where he stresses telling the story and singing and praising Hashem.
        14.   According to this approach, the deadline would be chatzot, in accordance with those opinions that give this as the deadline for consuming the
           korban pesach as well as the afikoman.
        15.   Rabbeinu Yonah himself in his Seder Leil Pesach paskened like Rabbi Elazar Ben Azaryah that one has to finish eating by chatzot. This seems to
           contradict how we have explained Rabbeinu Yonah here. Furthermore, Rabbeinu Yonah only mentioned the obligation of learning hilchot Pesach
           and doesn’t refer to continuing with sippur yetziat mitzrayim until dawn. One could argue that this is an independent obligation not connected
           to the mitzva of sippur yetziat mitzrayim. However, the Tur and Rosh quote him as including discussing sippur yetziat mitzrayim together with
           the obligation to study hilchot Pesach; accordingly, it sounds like both are included within the mitzva of sippur yetziat mitzrayim. In the body
           of the article we have stated Rabbeinu Yonah’s opinion based on how the Tur understood him. However, this matter requires further analysis.
        16.  Tur quoting Rabbeinu Yonah. See previous note.
        17.   Rashbam, Pesachim 108a, s.v. bein shelishi


                  This volume is not to be distributed.  Copies are for the personal use of purchaser only.
   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319