Page 101 - SEC_2017WorkingDocument_Neat
P. 101

Candidate       Paper    Hardship Case                         SAC

                 Number                                                         Recommendation/Decision
                 1002130570      010      The  candidate  reported  to  the  The estimated grades from
                                          incorrect centre for the examination  the teacher or the Order of
                                          and was informed that the venue for  Merit were not submitted.
                                          the  exam  was  the  office  of  the  The  SAC  recommended
                                          Overseas Examination Commission.   that  the  candidate  be
                                          The candidate then reported to the  awarded the earned grade,
                                          Overseas  Examination  Commission  III C C A.
                                          where  she  arrived  late  for  the
                                          examination.

                 1002130333      010      The  candidate  reported  to  the  The estimated grades from
                                          incorrect centre for the examination  the teacher or the Order of
                                          and was informed that the venue for  Merit were not submitted.
                                          the  exam  was  the  office  of  the  The  SAC  recommended
                                          Overseas Examination Commission.   that  the  candidate  be
                                          The candidate then reported to the  awarded the earned grade,
                                          Overseas  Examination  Commission  III C D B.
                                          where  she  arrived  late  for  the

                                          examination.

               FAC (14) 2017 - HUMAN AND SOCIAL BIOLOGY

               111.  FAC heard that in January 2017, there was a slight decline in the overall performance
               of candidates compared with January 2016.  Approximately 50 per cent of candidates attained
               acceptable grades, Grades I–III, compared with 53 per cent in January 2016. This decline in
               candidate performance was evident at the Grade III band only, while improvements were

               noted at the Grade I and Grade II bands.

               112.  Candidate  performance  improved  moderately  on  Profile  1,  Knowledge  and
               Comprehension, with 86 per cent of candidates attaining acceptable grades, Grades A-C, this
               year compared with 84 per cent in January 2016. Candidate performance remained consistent
               on Profile 2, Use of Knowledge, with 12 per cent of candidates attaining acceptable grades,
               Grades A-C, this year and in January 2016.

               FAC (15) 2017 - PHYSICS

               113.  FAC heard that there was an improvement in the overall performance of candidates
               in January 2017 with approximately 65 per cent of candidates attaining acceptable grades,
               Grades I–III, compared with 58 per cent in 2016. There were noted improvements at both the

               Grade I and II bands compared with January 2016.



                                                           31
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106