Page 12 - Historical Summaries (Persian Gulf) 1907-1953
P. 12

8
                                                         Government of
                     Tho predecessors of the present Sultan occupied
                                                      . India Secret
                   territory for ft good many years on the 1 ersiau despatch of
                   ■coast from Bunder Abbas to Lingali with tho
                   Island of Kislim, under a Birman of tho Shah of Mr. Murray,
                   Persia, to whom tboy paid rates or tribute, No. 12,January 16,
                   In 1855 a lease for twenty years was granted Mr.AHaon No.49,
                   at on annual rent. In 1808 a new arrangement April J ; No. 108,
                         , ,             .   .   . . . July 29 j No. 105,
                   was made for seven yoars, also at a rout, but, on August 4,1868.
                   the occasion of civil war in Muscat in 1809, the Mr. Thomson,
                   Shah cancollcd tho lease, undor powers given by September 8;
                   tho Convention, and resumed occupation of tho No.70,Octoborl9j
                   territory in question.                November 26,
                     Gwndur is an enclave on tho confines of 18C9,
                   Persia and Boluchistan, which has for over 100
                   years formed part of the dominions of tho Sultan
                   of Muscat, to whom it was granted by the Khan
                   of Khelat. It extends for a radius of one stage
                   (about 10 or 16 miles from the town of Gwndur).
                   In this territory is a station of tho Indo-European
                   telegraph, but it has never been occupied by
                   Great Britain.
                   - The British connection with Muscat is of long Government of
                   standing. Treaties of Friendship and Commerce,   India Secret
                                                         despatch, vide
                   as well as for the suppression of slavery, have supra.
                   been concluded with successive Imams of Muscat
                   on different occasions since 1798. In that year
                   the first engagement was entered into between
                   the East India Company and Saiyid Sultan for
                   the exclusion from his territories of French
                   influence, which contemplated fiuding in Muscat
                    a convenient basis of attack upon India in
                    the war then being waged between Great Britain
                    and France. At a later date, on the death
                    of Saiyid Said in 1856, a dispute arose
                    between liis two sons as to the possession
                    of Muscat and Zanzibar, wliich had hitherto
                    been united under tho same Ruler. This was
                    referred to the arbitration of the Viceroy of
                    India, then Lord Canning, who, after careful
                    inquiry, decided that the two Slates should
                    remain separate, being divided between the two
                    brothers, but that Zanzibar, in virtue of its
                    superior wealth, should pay to Muscat a yearly
                    subsidy of 40,000 crowns (5,700/.). At a subse­
                    quent period, in 1873, the British Government, in
                    return for Agreements concerning the suppres­
                    sion of the Slave Trade, successfully concluded
                    with the Rulers both of Muscat and Zanzibar,
                    undertook to relieve the latter of this payment,
                    which has since that date been made by the
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17