Page 16 - Historical Summaries (Persian Gulf) 1907-1953
P. 16

—^
                                                                                                !
                                                                                                I

                                    12

                   required to dismiss q particular advisor must depend on
                   the speoial circumstances of the case, it is hardly oom-
                   patible with the independence of Muscat Hint the Sultan
                   should be compelled to accept Ministers and advisers
                   who are acceptable to tho British Government.
                         “ (Signed)  RICHARD E. WEBSTER.
                                    EGBERT B. FINLAY.
                    “ I.axo Officer*' Dcjxirtment,
                        i/arch 8, 1899.”
                                                                                                 I
                    With regard to the French coaling station at
                   Bunder Gisscb, Her Majesty’s Government ex­
                   pressed both to His Highness the Sultan and to
                   Franco tho view that tho sale or lease of any
                   part of TTis Highness’ dominions to a foreign
                   Power was not only a breach of the Sultan’s
                   Agreement with Great Britain of 1S01, but was
                  also inconsistent with the Declaration concluded
                   between the British and French Governments in
                   ]SG2. The Government of the French Republic i7»/« liriLfrli
                  accepted the British reading of the latter in- SllsrauViIlm’s
                   strumont, viz., that neither State might accept   Arbitration.
                  any cession or lease of Muscat territory; and
                  it was agreed that France should be free
                   to establish a coal dep6t on tho same terms
                  as those granted to Great Britain, viz., ou
                  sufTerancc, and such a depot has been established
                  iu Muscat Harbour on a portion of the ground
                  originally allotted to Great Britain for tho
                  purpose. Tho result, therefore, of Britisli action
                  nas to prevent a lcaso or cession of territory to
                  France in contravention of the Declaration of
                  1862, which Mould otherwise have Liken pl .ee.
                  In other words, the British protest, so far from
                  being a breach of that Declaration as argued
                  by the French Government, prevented its breach
                  by France.

                       Grant of French flags to Muscat Dhows.

                    France lias always refused to permit the exer­
                  cise by the war-ships of any other Power of the
                  droit de vitite on the high seas as regards ships
                  carrying the French flag, and, by only partially
                  ratifying the Brussels General Act in IS02, she
                  preserved this claim to resist the right of search.
                    The French officials in Obokh, Madagascar,
                  and tbe Comoros have granted, from time to
                  time, French ships’ papers and flags to subjects
                  of the Sultan of Muscat, and the same course
                  has l>cen taken by the French Consuls at Aden,
                  Muscat, and Zanzibar. Most of the Omanis who
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21