Page 132 - Historical Summaries (Persian Gulf) 1907-1953
P. 132

4
                   Tbo Government of India have also from time
                 to time recommended—
                   (1.) That the "French Government should ho
                 approached with a view to their being induced
                 to agreo to the total prohibition of the arms
                  traffic at Muscat; and
                   (2.) That the Porte should ho asked to agree to
                 our patrolling the Turkish littoral against arms
                 smugglers, or at least to declare the illegality of
                 tho traffic.

                   Neither of these suggestions has hitherto Government of
                 borne fruit. Tho question was passed in review   India’s letter of
                                                        February 21, 1907.
                 by tho Government of India as recently as
                 February 1907, and the conclusion at which
                 thoy arrived, after a careful and detailed ex­
                 amination of the case, was that the arms traffic
                 would continue to flourish aud increase until an
                 Agreement with Franco was arrived at, and a
                 complete prohibition was enforced against the
                 importation of arms and ammunition into the
                 territories of the Sultan of Muscat. The whole
                 question will come up for discussion at the forth­
                 coming International Conference at Brussels.
                   Under the Brussels Act of 1890 for regulating
                 the traffic in arms, anyone of the Signatory Powers
                 that has occasion to authorize such traffic in
                 territories of its own lying within the region
                 affected by the provisions of the Act, is required
                 to establish a “ public warehouse,” under the
                 control of its local Administration, in which all
                 imported arms must be deposited, and from
                 which they may not bo withdrawn without the
                 previous authorization of the Administration.
                   There seems no hope of obtaining the consent
                 of France, and the other Powers having Treaty
                 relations with Muscat, to the Sultan’s prohibiting,
                 proprio motu, the import of arras into his
                 dominions. The only remedy for the present
                 evil would, therefore, appear to be to bring
                 Muscat, at the forthcoming Conference, within
                 the scope of the Brussels Act of 1890, and to
                 enforce there the provisions requiring the
                 establishment of a warehouse under proper
                 supervision.
                   If this is done, two questions will arise:—
                   (a.) What inducement shall be offered to the
                 Sultan, a Sovereign whose independence has
                 been guaranteed by Great Britain and France, to
                 accept restrictions on a traffic amounting to
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137