Page 254 - Gulf Precis (VI)_Neat
P. 254

228                      Part III.
                         divided by Messrs. Remington & Co. into tho two following heads .- 1st—Rent
                         of tho premises at Marghcil from tlio 1st November 1839 to the 1st May 1814,
                         being 54. months at Rs. 200 per mensom Rs. 10,S00. 2nd—Ront for a house
                         and garden at Baghdad from tho 1st May 1810 to the 1st August 1813, beiug
                         39 months at Rs. 100 per monsem Rs. 3,900 : total Rs. 14,700.
                             238. From the obovo review of tho former proceedings of Government on
                         this subject, it is shown that no sanction was given for tho occupation of the
                         premises at Margheil for tho use of Government until May 18 M, tho previous
                         applications of Captain Lynch on this subject having beon negatived. It  was
                         clear, howovor, from the certificates which accompanied this letter that theso
                         premises have been used as a dep6t for the stores of the Euphrates Flotilla
                         from the 1st November 1839. The Bombay Government therefore recommend­
                         ed to the Government of India to permit Colonel Taylor to bo reimbursed for
                                                       tho use of those premises from thatdato, at
                            Not*.—'Thi« would for tho period cnlculoted
                         b» limn. Remington amount to tho lum of Ri. the rate at tlio time paid for them, under
                         6,'400.                       the sanction of tho Government of India,
                         namely, Rs. 100 por mensem. This allowance was to include tho house and
                         garden at Baghdad, for tho occupation of which no authority had at any time
                         been given by Government.
                             239.  Tho proposal of tho Bombay Government was approved by tho Gov­
                         ernment of (vide their letter No. 450, dated 29th May 1817).
                             240.  The lease of Margheil was renewed from time to time since 1847. In
                         1858 tho Government of India authorised tlio payment of Messrs. Lynch & Co.
                         of a sum of Rs. 2,000 ns compensation for damage done to their Quays in the
                         course of the Persian war, when large number of horses and mules and quantity
                         of stores were collected on their property and conveyed thence for tho use of tho
                         expedition (Government of India letter No. 1676, dated 30th April 1858, to
                         the Bombay Government).
                             241.  In 1869, there was a proposal for the reduction of expenditure in the
                         Agency of Turkish Arabia. On tho 20th of January 1878, tho Political Agent
                         in Turkish Arabia stated that tho only reduction or saving which could be
                                                       effected iu his Agency would he by tho
                          Finance A., Jane 1870, Noi. 4-8.
                                                       removal of the coal store and depdt of Her
                         Majesty’s steam vessel Comet from Magliil to the immediate neighbourhood
                         of Basrah. Maghil being a place about three miles above tho town of Basrah,
                         its isolated position necessitated tho maintenance of a guard, at an annual cost
                         of Rs. 751*12.0, together with an outlay for lighter hire.
                             242.  Colonel Herbert recommended that a site should bo purchased at
                         Basrah for which, and for tho erection of tho buildings, it was estimated that
                         a sum of R9.10,000 would be required. The total annual cost of the depdt as
                         then kept up was Rs. 2,192. If the establishment were removed to Basrah it
                         was estimated that its annual cost would be Rs. 588 together with Rs. 500 as
                         interest on the sum originally required to provide the site and buildings =
                         Rs. 1,088 per annum. The annual saving would, therefore, be Rs. 1,088 as
                         compared with Rs. 2,192, or Rs. 1,104 annually. This saving would repay the
                         original outlay in nine years, after which the annual cost of tho depot would
                         be Rs.. 688, making an eventual saving of 11s. 1,604 a year, while the ground
                         and building would be the property of Government. It was added that sooner
                         or luter a change would become necessary, as the river was gradually encroach­
                         ing on their dopdt.
                             243.  The question merged for a time into the large one of the expediency
                          of keeping up a Government vessel at all on the Euphrates, but at length,
                                                       after consultation with the Milttary .De­
                           Pclitic*] An March 1872, No. 78.
                                                       partment, Colonel Herbert was told in
                          March 1872 that it was left to his discretion to make the change, provided he
                          could assure Government that it would result in a reasonable saving of
                          expease.
                             244. In January 1873 Messrs. Lynch & Co., who or one of whose members
                                                       own the property, in a letter to the India
                           Politic*! A, March 1873, Hot. 18M49.
                           . .                         Office remonstrated against Government
                          giving up, for only a saving of Rs. 100 per mensem, a hold upon a land, which
                          for oyer a century had been regarded as an English ground and for long associat­
                          ed with the British name and prestige and which the Turkish authorities had
   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259