Page 373 - Gulf Precis (VII)_Neat
P. 373

25
                            (viii) Colonel Goldsmid's third Report of 1S0I,
                                             30. Colonel "Goldsmid’s Third Report
              No. 18, dated Baghdad, 27th April 1804.
                    Volume 80 of 1801.     may be more fully quoted :
                “ Bearing in mind the original question of ‘ how far tho claims of Persia, Kolat, or Maskafc,
            or any other State, to any sovereign right in any town or districts in Mckrau are founded on
             Treaty or possession, or acknowledgment by the local rulers/ my previous letters will have
            shown
                   I.—That, in my opinion, the claims of Persia to Mekran generally arc based upon
                      somewhat traditionary conquests of former years, more or less substantiated by
                      the formal disposal of the province to Mohbut Khan Brahui in the middle of
                      the last century ; that the later rise of a new Government and enterprise of a
                      new  Chief iu Baluchistan virtually dispossessed Persia of her never well-defined
                      Mckrau territories; but that forcible reassertion of the Shah's sovereignty over
                      certain parts of Mckrau, so far as hitherto carried out, however unwarrantable
                       in accordance with the rule of European polities, is not a matter with which
                      wo can interfere upon a bare principle of justice and equity. In this view, such
                      Mekran territories as Persia now holds in tribute, are hers by mere right of
                       possession.
                 II.—1That those portions of Mekran obeying the authority of the Khan of Kelat are
                      that Chief's by possession, and also by acknowledgment of the lo -al ruiers.
                      They are part of au inherited Baluchistan State, held, at first, iu ^rum-feudal
                      tenure from Persia, subsequently from Candahar, hut in reality on a basisof
                      independence. The revolutions which distracted the province after the deathof
                      Nussir Khan in 1 795 can only effect such petty Cbiefdoms as have been
                      successful in permanently throwing off their allegiance. Those which revolted
                      and were afterwards subdued still remain component parts of the inheritance
                      of the Khans.
                 III.—That Charbar and Gwadur belong to the Imam of Maskat by right of posses­
                      sion—the last on a tenure disputed by the Bcluchis ; the former with acknow­
                      ledgment of the local rulers.
                “ Setting aside nice geographical distinctions, and regarding Mekran as that part of
            Baluchistin westward of Kelat, Kharau, and Bela, we find a political status much as
             follows
                                        Persian, West,
                 BumpurDizzuk and dependencies ; Geh and dependencies—Baho Dastyari.
                                        Bclucl, East.
                Kej and dependencies—Puujgur.
                                          Arab.
                Charbar iu the west, Gwadur the east division.  *     *
                “My letter No. 5, of 22nd January last, will, it is believed, have rendered clear
                          B                that this district (and town) was not only
                           nmpur.          independent of Persia more than fifty years
             ago, but that it was customary for its Chief to organize plundering expeditions from
            thence into the neighbouring province of Kerman. It also expressed a commonly received
            opinion on the immediate cause of advaucc to this particular quarter in about 1814. I have
            seen no reason to modify the conclusion drawn from these statements. Much more
            evidence might be adduced on the subject, but the strong positive testimony of Captain
            Grant and Lieutenant Pottinger is readily available for reference. It is not unreasonable to
            infer that the spirit in which the marauding Chiefs of Bampur carried on their chapaos across
            the border gave evideuce of intended reprisal for former oppression ; and the fact of possession
            by Persia at the present day must be attributed to force only, not to the existence of any
            legitimate claim, or acknowledgment by local rulers. The Nharuis, like their neighbours,
            obeyed the orders of their own Chief, whose true position wus that of a feudatory of
            Baluchistan.
                “ Dizzuk, though not on tho sea coast, forms a very important part of Northern Mekran
              Dizzut, including J.lk. Sibb, Erobb.bzu, within thePersianline of possession. But the
            llabsbun, Bnmpuslit, Moitao, Hung, Zjarut, niain object of including it within the range on
            Kulpurakan, etc., etc.         the present enquiry is to use it as a key to the
                                           whole question under discussion. Frequent per­
            sonal intercourse with its acknowledged hereditary Chief has enabled me to summarize a
            narrative which tells, more or less literally, the tale of Bampur, of Gch, and of every petty
            State in Mekran.
                “ When Nadir Shah was in the zenith of his power, he bestowed Dizzuk, in fice gift*
            on the ancestor of the present Chief. When Nussir Khan became ruler in Baluchistan,
            Dizzuk fell within his r.iuge of control. lie shook off the Persian yoke, and while transferring
               2136 F. D.
   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378