Page 59 - Records of Bahrain (4) (ii)_Neat
P. 59

Regional relations, 1926-1931              361


              principle that tho issue of a law on Nationality was a
              matter for his sovereign rights,   It seemed test therefore
              to see how far tho Hejazi Goverrment were prepared to go by
              amendments in tho law of 1926.without officially admitting
              tho right of His Majesty's Government to intervene.
                 3.  When Sheikh Yussuf Yasin referred to Mr.Bird's
              memorandum at the outset of our conversation on February 4th,
              I reminded him that it had been an unofficial paper and
              explained the procedure which your predocessor had in view at

              that time, but I did not press the matter,    I went on to say
              that I had myself been led to consider points not raised in
               that memorandum and that, while those points did not bear on
              the form of the law, thoy might affect our appreciation of
               it. I raised the question whether the law was intended to
              apply to all the King's dominions,    The Sheikh seemed a
               little surprised but said that in his view it was of general
              application and not confined to tho Hejaz as might appear
              from the title. Having elicited this, I did not stress the
               point further, as I did not wish to mention Asir.

                   4.   I explained that, if the law did apply throughout
               the King's dominions, it would have a bearing on questions
              which concerned us, such as that of Bahrain subjects in Hasa
               and Hadramis in the Ilejaz. Later on the Sheikh hinted that
               the question of the Bahrainis would come into Persian Gulf
              negotiations. This is my ovm view and I assented generally.
               I did not pursue the question of Hadramis, as it was one which
               I have not fully studied. I also kept off Iraqis, except

               for expressing a smiling hope that before long any matters
               affecting them would be dealt with by an Iraqi representative.
                  5.   I referred also to the question of Ikhtilaf-ud-Dar
               (See ray despatch No.188 of July 24th last). Citing the
               oase of Osman Holcim as on illustration, I said there were
               oases in whioh a British subject might have so identified                   !
               himself with this oountry, without ooasing to be British,
                                                                that/
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64