Page 28 - Records of Bahrain (2)(ii)_Neat
P. 28

354
                                           Records of Bahrain
                                    . 22 •

                        , regard to . the ljrafc question,, viz., that of
                 the- independence of Bahrein, the following account
                ’•wa?’given by'the Indian Governmentr.
                   VII. was governed..by Arab;.Sheikhs, till 1506,
                 •when, it fell into the hands of .•the.. Portuguese, from
                 whom it was wrested in a few, yoars.by Persia.
                 During part of the 17th century, and for 25  years
                 at the end of the 18th century, Bahrein paid
                 tribute to the Shah; but from 1782 to 1801 it
                 gave her allegiance to Muscat.
                  : "From 1801 to 1820 the Wahabcesand Uttoobecs   llcrtblet’s Treaties, vol. viii,
                 fought for the possession of the" islands; in the   p. 71)4 ;
                                                             State Papers, vol. lvi, p. 1400.
                 latter year a Treaty was concluded, in which Bahrein
                 and all the Chiefs of the Gulf pledged themselves
                 to pcaco. with the British Government,-and the
                 suppression of piracy. The Uttoobecs, at that time
                 masters of Bahrein, in 183G agreed, on certain
                 conditions, to pay tribute, to the Wahabccs, and
                 in 1839 made'the same arrangement with Egypt,
                 which, however, soon fell to the ground.
                   “ In 1845, the British Government first used
                 their influence with Bahrein, when (on the occasion
                 of disputes arising between the members of the
                 ruling family ip the island) they objected to the
                 interference of Persia, and ordered an exiled cx-
                 Sheikh to abstain from disturbing the peace of the
                 gulf. In 1847 (? 1848) the ruling Sheikh of
                 Bahrein offered allegiance to Great Britain, which,
                 however, was refused. In 1859, the above-men­
                 tioned cx-Shcikh was expelled from his stronghold,
                 whence ho had organized piratical expeditions against
                 Bahrein. Shortly afterwards the ruling Sheikh on
                 being remonstrated with on account of certain law­
                 less acts, declared his allegiance to Turkey > but in
                  1801 he concluded a Treaty with Great Britain State Papers, rol. rt, p. 1402.
                 (similar to that of 1820)promising, as “independent
                 Ruler of Bahrein,” to abstain from acts of piracy, &c.
                   " Her Majesty’s Government having concluded
                 this .Treaty with the Sheikh a6 an independent
                 ruler, .refused to concur in a proposal made by the
                 Shah that the Sovereignty of Bahrein should be
                 transferred%to the’ Persian Grown.
                    " Tho despatch , then'called attention to the fact
                 that when, in 18G8, it was found. necessary to
                  punish the Chief.of Bahrein without reference being
                  made to Persia, the $hah!s- remonstrance was met
                  by a reference’to the decision .of . Her Majesty’s
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33