Page 82 - BUKU MODEL ADISI

BUKU MODEL ADISI 79

Mastering of Human Excretory System Materials. Journal of Science
Learning, 6(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i2.54634

Rosidin, U., Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can Argument-Driven
Inquiry Models Have Impact on Critical Thinking Skills for Students with
Differentpersonality Types? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 511–526.
https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725
Rundgren, C. J., Eriksson, M., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2016). Investigating the
Intertwinement of Knowledge, Value, and Experience of Upper Secondary
Students’ Argumentation Concerning Socioscientific Issues. Science and
Education, 25(9–10), 1049–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9859-x
Rundgren, S. N. C., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a Separate to a
Holistic View of Socioscientific Issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science
Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–24.

Sadler, T. D. (2003). Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A
Critical Review of Research. Journal of Research in Science.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A
Critical Review of Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5),
513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009

Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific Issues-Based Education: What We Know
About Science Education in the Context of SSI. 355–369.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_20
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What Do Students Gain by Engaging
in Socioscientific Inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9

Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific Argumentation: The
Effects of Content Knowledge and Morality. International Journal of Science
Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The Significance of Content Knowledge for
Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics
Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023

Safitri, M. A. D., Budiasih, E., & Marfu’ah, S. (2020). Mind Mapping in the
Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model to Improve Students’ Cognitive
Learning Outcomes on Reaction Rate Topic. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 8(3),
96–103.
http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jps/article/view/14082%0Ahttp://journal.u
m.ac.id/index.php/jps/article/download/14082/6701

Sampson, V., Carafano, P., Enderle, P., Fannin, S., Grooms, J., Southerland, S. A.,
Stallworth, C., & Williams, K. (2015). Argument-Driven Inquiry in.

LISA UTAMI