Page 168 - Human Rights
P. 168

Faculty of Nursing
                                                                   Adult care Nursing Department



               Thus,  for  example,  when  allocating  resources  for  a  clinical  intervention  that  benefits  a  large

               segment of the population and disregarding another treatment that benefits only a small minority

               (e.g., orphan diseases), deliberative democracy through the active and informed participation of
               society should be considered.


               Indeed, rational democratic deliberation is a fair way to decide these controversial issues and to

               make choices that traditional democratic representation is unable to make appropriately.


               Progressively,  systematic  consultation  with  an  informed  public,  its  involvement  in  critical

               decisions, and the establishment of partnerships in the decision-making processes exemplify the
               high level of citizenship regarding decisions about health policy.


               Fairness,  from  a  Rawlsian  perspective  (Rawls  1971,  2001),  means  that  the  empowerment  of
               society and the subsequent social choices comply with the principle of equal opportunity.


               Rational democratic deliberation should abide by the fundamental values of liberal democracies.

               Further, the rights of minorities must always be protected by the majority vote, namely ensuring

               that  their  voices  are  heard  through  the  active  participation  of  patient  advocacy  groups,  a
               fundamental step in scrutinizing government decisions.


               The  different  accountability  levels,  from  the  individual  provider  to  the  top  manager  of  the

               healthcare system, represent the different types of participation in the democratic process. As

               Norman Daniels (Daniels et al. 1996) suggests, one aspect of public accountability is to undertake

               careful,  scientific  assess  mints  of  the  performance  of  the  system  as  a  whole  and  its  various
               components.


               Public reporting  of these  outcome  measures  is likely  to  be  perceived  as  threatening to some

               interests. But a refinement of this sort of evaluation is an essential mechanism for improving the
               system and relying on consumer choices to force such improvements in quality.





                               146                                                                        Academic Year 2025/2026
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173