Page 102 - Agroforestry system - book inner (final corrected) - 9.-3-21_Neat
P. 102

National level e-symposium on “Agroforestry system for augmenting livestock
                                     productivity and empowering resource poor rural farmers”



             intestinal microbial balance (Fuller, 1989). Prebiotics are non-digestible food ingredients which beneficially
             affect the host selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one or limited number of bacteria in the
             digestive system and thus improve the host health (Gibson and Roberfroid, 1995). Synbiotics are defined
             as a mixture of probiotics and prebiotics that beneficially affects the host by improving the survival and
             implantation of live microbial dietary supplements in the gastrointestinal tract. Synbiotics have been reported
             to provide different health benefits and used as growth promoters in poultry. Scientific literatures on effect of
             dietary supplementation of synbiotic on production performance of broiler are available but are not available
             on Japanese quail in India. Hence, the present study was conducted to find out the effect of effect of dietary
             supplementation of synbiotic on production performance of meat type Japanese quail.

             Materials and Methods

                 A total of 300 day old  quail chicks were randomly divided into three treatment groups (Control T1, T2 &
             T3), with four replicates of 25 each. The basal diets were formulated as per the recommended concentrations
             of nutrients and supplemented with synbiotic to control T1, T2 and T3 groups @ 0, 0.05 and 0.1% inclusion
             level, respectively. Each five gram of the synbiotic supplement has selective strains of probiotics, namely,
             Sacchromyses  cerevisiae   (25x10  CFU),  Lactobacillus sporogenes (20x10 CFU)   Aspergillus  oryzae
                                            9
                                                                                   6
             (20x10 CFU) and prebiotic, Fructo oligosaccharide (250mg). Adlibitum feed and water was provided  for
                   6
             the chicks throughout the experimental period. The data on body weight, feed intake and livability were
             recorded biweekly from 0 day to 4 weeks of age. All the data obtained were analyzed statistically using one
             way ANOVA (SPSS V 20).

             Results and Discussion

                 The statistical analysis of the results revealed that the dietary supplementation of synbiotic at 0.05% level
             exerted significantly (P < 0.05) higher mean body weight (g) from second to four weeks of age followed by
             0.1% supplemented birds and control birds. Among synbiotic supplemented groups, the birds supplemented
             with synbiotic at 0.05% level had significantly (P < 0.05) higher mean body weight (g) from second to four
             weeks. Similarly, Elshageer et al. (2020) also found that the Japanese quail fed with 0.1% synbiotic had
             higher (P < 0.05) body weight in quails at 42 days of age. However, addition of synbiotic at different levels
             had no significant effect on body weight of Japanese quails at 42 days of age (Sharifi et al., 2011  and Tufan
             and Bolacali 2017).

                Table.1. Effect of dietary supplementation of synbiotic on production performance of meat type
                                                Japanese quail (Mean±SE)

                                                  Control- T1              T2                    T3
                       Parameters
                                                     (0%)               (0.05%)               (0.1%)
              Hatch weight                   8.83±0.32             8.81±0.36            8.82±0.33
                          NS
              1  week body weight(g)         20.18 ±0.26           20.24 ±0.22          20.46 ±0.28
               st
                                   NS
              2  week body weight(g) *       50.84  ±0.89          57.85  ±0.84         50.93 ±0.77
                                                                                             b
                                                   b
                                                                        a
               nd
              3   week body weight(g) *      95.30  ±1.41          106.53 ±1.55         100.78  ±1.52
               rd
                                                                          a
                                                                                              b
                                                   c
              4   week body weight (g) *     149.84 ±2.06          155.26 ±1.73         150.20 ±1.56
                                                                                              b
                                                                         a
               th
                                                   b
                                            Institute of Animal Nutrition, Centre for Animal Production Studies, TANUVAS
                                                              National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development  83
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107