Page 53 - ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
P. 53

53


               rank. When a deserving faculty member is promoted to a higher rank or sub-rank, his present
               position becomes vacant and will then be filled-up again by a faculty below and so on.

               3.3 Faculty – refers to the University personnel with faculty items who are primarily engaged
               in  actual  teaching  as  well  as  in,  or  in  combination  with  research, extension  or production
               work/assignment.

               3.4  Qualifications  –  refers  to  the  highest  educational  attainment,  academic  and  related
               experience as well as relevant professional development that includes seminars, trainings,
               consultancy,  expert  services,  honors,  awards,  licensure  exams,  community  outreach  as
               identified in the Common Criteria for Evaluation (CCE) under NBC 461.

               3.5 Performance – refers to the performance ratings of the faculty member based on the
               Performance  Evaluation  System  (PES)  of  the  University  and  the  Qualitative  Contribution
               Evaluation (QCE) prescribed under the National Budget Circular (NBC) No. 461.

               3.6 National Budget Circular (NBC) No. 461 – refers to the Circular issued by the Department
               of Budget & Management (DBM) to establish and prescribe rules and regulations governing
               the implementation of the Revised Compensation and Position Classification Plan for faculty
               positions  in  SUCs,  HEIs  and  TEIs  in  accordance  with  the  Modified  Common  Criteria  for
               Evaluation (CCE) for faculty positions.
               3.7 Deep Selection – the process of promoting a faculty candidate who is not next-in-rank but
               has a higher ranking points in terms of qualifications and performance.

               3.8 Next-in-Rank Faculty  – refers to a faculty member who occupies a position which, by
               reason of the hierarchical arrangement of positions is determined to be in the nearest degree
               of  relationship  to  a  higher  position  as  contained  in  the  University’s  System  of  Ranking
               Positions (SRP).

               3.9 Comparatively at Par – predetermined reasonable difference or gap between the ranking
               points of the candidates for promotion.

               3.10  Qualification  Standards  –  refer  to  the  statement  of  the  minimum  qualifications  for  a
               position,  which  shall  include  education,  experience,  training,  civil  service  eligibility,  and
               physical characteristics and personality traits required in the performance of the job.

               3.11 System of Ranking Positions – is the hierarchical arrangement of positions from highest
               to lowest, which shall be a guide in determining which position is next-in-rank.

               4.0 PROMOTION POLICIES

               4.1 All faculty members considered for promotion will be evaluated based on the guidelines
               and factors prescribed under NBC 461 CCE and/or other issuances for faculty evaluation.

               4.2 Factors to be considered shall be the following:

                   a)  Qualifications

                       a.1 Education – shall refer to the relevant highest academic degree earned within the
                       rating period.
                       a.2  Experience  –  shall  refer  to  academic  and  related  professional  experience/s
                       acquired within the rating period.
                       a.3 Professional Development, Achievements and Honors – shall refer to Item 3.0 in
                       the PASUC Common Criteria for Evaluation under NBC 461.
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58