Page 55 - ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

55

justified by the University President. This policy is in conformity with the “No Quantum Leap”
policy – a quality standard which shall limit promotions not exceeding six (6) sub-ranks or the
highest sub-rank of the next higher rank. (Amended under Board Res. 70, s. 2002).

4.8 A faculty candidate who is not next-in-rank may be promoted instead of one who is next-
in-rank for as long as the former possesses higher ranking in terms of qualifications and
performance. However, in order to create more vacancies, a faculty candidate presently
occupying a sub-rank (e.g., Associate Professor 1) is given a priority to a higher sub-rank of
the same rank (e.g., Associate Professor 2) over a candidate coming from a lower rank (e.g.,
Associate Professor 4) even if the latter has a higher points for as long as the Comparatively
at Par point difference is not more than 3, provided further that the latter faculty will also be
promoted (e.g., to Associate Professor 1).
4.9 Faculty members who have been left out of the Quota for Associate Professor or Professor
nd
ranks under the NCC 69, 2 Cycle (where they had already met the points of Professor or
Associate Professor) and where thus only given the higher sub-rank of a lower faculty rank
(Assistant Professor 4 or Associate Professor 5) will be given priority over non-quota
candidates even if the latter points for as long as the Comparatively at Par point difference is
not more than three (3). Otherwise, the non-quota faculty will be promoted. This will solve the
complaints of faculty members who have already long met the points required for Associate
Professor or Professor but where not yet given the corresponding faculty rank because of the
quota system under NCC 69.

5.0 MECHANICS

5.1 There will be announcements of evaluation of documents for promotion in conspicuous
places in all the Colleges in the Campus where there are vacancies within a reasonable period
before the start of the evaluation of documents for evaluation. A deadline for submission of
documents will be set.

5.2 The campus Evaluation Committee will convene soonest after the deadline to start
evaluating documents. The Campus HRMO will forward copies of the QCE and PES of the
faculty candidates for promotion to the Campus Evaluation Committee.

5.3 Before the Campus Evaluation Committee will transfer the results of the evaluation of
documents to the proper form (FPE Form 1) and the ranking prepared, faculty members may
be allowed to clarify their points. No additional document, will, however, be accepted after the
deadline. (Note: FPE means Faculty Promotion Evaluation).

5.4 The QCE and PES quantitative ratings of the faculty candidates will be summarized in the
prescribed (FPE Form 2). The Performance points will then be added to the CCE points to get
the total points.

5.5 From the total points, ranking per faculty rank and sub-rank will be prepared and
summarized in the proper from (FPE Form 3). The result of evaluation and ranking will be
forwarded to the Campus Faculty Selection and Promotion Board (CFSPB).

5.6 The CFSPB will review and deliberate on the results of evaluation and ranking and
determine those who will be promoted. The list of faculty to be promoted will be summarized
in the proper form (FPE Form 4).

5.7 The result of evaluation and ranking will be posted in all the Colleges of the Campus for
the information of all concerned faculty members.