Page 112 - U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
P. 112

A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Second Edition.


            41     Council  of  Europe,  Criminal  Law  Convention  on   available  at  http://sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2010/comp-
            Corruption,  Jan.  27,  1999,  38  I.L.M.  505,  available  at  http://  pr2010-51.pdf;  Complaint,  SEC v. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft,
            conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/html/173.html.  No. 08- cv-2167 (D.D.C. Dec. 12, 2008), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter
                                                                SEC v. Siemens  AG]  (German  company),  available at  http://
            42     For  additional  information  about  GRECO,  see   www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2008/comp20829.pdf.
            Council of Europe, Group of States Against Corruption, available   Certain  DOJ  enforcement  actions  have  likewise  involved
            at   http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/greco/default_  foreign issuers. See, e.g., Criminal Information, United States
            EN.asp.  The  United  States  has  not  yet  ratified  the  GRECO   v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson,  No.  19-cr-884  (S.D.N.Y.
            convention.                                         Dec. 6, 2019), ECF No. 3 [hereinafter United States v. Ericsson],
                                                                available  at  https://justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1226526/
            43     The  text  of  the  FCPA  statute  is  set  forth  in  the   download; Non-Pros. Agreement, In re Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.
            appendix. See also Jury Instructions at 52-64, United States   (Sept. 26, 2018), available at https://www.justice.gov/criminal-
            v. Mark Lambert, No. 18-cr-012 (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2019), ECF   fraud/file/1097256/download;  Criminal  Information,  United
            No.  152  [hereinafter  United States v. Lambert]  (FCPA  jury   States v. Teva LLC, No. 16-cr-20967 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 22, 2016),
            instructions);  Jury  Instructions  at  1259-66,  United States v.   ECF  No.  1,  available  at  https://www.justice.gov/criminal-
            Lawrence  Hoskins,  No.  12-cr-238  (D.  Conn.  Nov.  6,  2019),   fraud/file/920421/download;  Criminal  Information,  United
            ECF  No.  601  [hereinafter  United States v. Hoskins]  (same);   States v. Braskem S.A., No. 16-cr-709 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2016),
            Jury  Instructions  at  33-37,  United States v. Joseph Baptiste,   ECF  No.  6,  available  at  https://www.justice.gov/criminal-
            No.  17-cr-10305  (D.  Mass.  June  19,  2019),  ECF     fraud/file/920086/download.
            No.  195  [hereinafter  United  States  v.  Baptiste]  (same);
            Jury  Instructions  at  1081-89,  United States v. Chi Ping   48   See  http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/internatl/
            Patrick  Ho,  No.  17-cr-779  (S.D.N.Y.  Dec.  4,  2018),  ECF   companies.html.
            No.  214  [hereinafter  United States v. Ho]  (same);  Jury
            Instructions  at  4249-62,  United States v. Ng Lap Seng,     49   See, e.g.,  Criminal  Information,  United States v.
            No.  15-cr-706  (S.D.N.Y.  July  26,  2017),  ECF  No.  609   Ericsson,  supra  note  47  (charging  issuer  company  with
            [hereinafter  United States v. Ng]  (same);  Jury  Instructions   violating FCPA for paying bribes to foreign officials in Djibouti,
            at  21-27,  United States v. Esquenazi,  No.  09-cr-21010   China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Kuwait); Criminal Information,
            (S.D.  Fla.  Aug.  5,  2011),  ECF  No.  520  [hereinafter   United States v. Tim Leissner, No. 18-cr-439 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 28,
            United  States  v.  Esquenazi]  (same);  Jury  Instructions  at     2018), ECF No. 16 (charging an employee and agent of U.S.
            14-25,  United  States  v.  Kay,  No.  01-cr-914  (S.D.  Tex.  Oct.   publicly traded company with violating FCPA for bribery of
            6,  2004),  ECF  No.  142  (same),  aff’d,  513  F.3d  432,  446-52   official  in  Malaysia),  available at  https://www.justice.gov/
            (5th  Cir.  2007),  reh’g  denied,  513  F.3d  461  (5th  Cir.  2008)   criminal-fraud/file/1231346/download; United States v. Steven,
            [hereinafter  United States v. Kay];  Jury  Instructions  at     supra note 9 (charging a UK employee of U.S. publicly traded
            76-87, United States v. Jefferson, No. 07-cr-209 (E.D. Va. July   company with violating FCPA for bribery of officials in Saudi
            30, 2009), ECF No. 684 [hereinafter United States v. Jefferson]   Arabia).
            (same);  Jury  Instructions  at  8-10,  United  States  v.  Green,
            No.  08-cr-59  (C.D.  Cal.  Sept.  11,    2009),  ECF  No.  288   50   15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2.
            [hereinafter United States v. Green] (same); Jury Instructions
            at  23-29,  United States v. Bourke,  No.  05-cr-518  (S.D.N.Y.   51   15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2(h)(1).
            July 2009) [hereinafter United States v. Bourke] (same, not
            docketed);  Jury  Instructions  at  2-8,  United States v. Mead,   52   See, e.g., Indictment, United States v. Lambert, supra
            No. 98-cr-240 (D.N.J. Oct. 1998) [hereinafter United States   note 43, ECF No. 1 (employee of domestic concern charged
            v. Mead] (same).                                    with violating FCPA for bribes paid to a Russian government
                                                                official),  available  at  https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/
            44     The provisions of the FCPA applying to issuers are   file/1044676/download;  Criminal  Information,  United States
            part  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  [hereinafter   v. James Finley,  No.  17-cr-160  (S.D.  Ohio  July  21,  2017),
            Exchange Act]. The anti-bribery provisions can be found at   ECF No. 3 (executive of foreign parent company charged as
            Section 30A of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1.  an agent of a domestic concern in directing bribes to Kazakh
                                                                official on behalf of U.S.-based subsidiary), available at https://
            45     15 U.S.C. § 78l.                             www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1009596/download;
                                                                Superseding  Indictment,  United  States v.  Dmitrij  Harder,
            46     15 U.S.C. § 78o(d).                          No. 15-cr-001 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2015), ECF No. 62 [hereinafter
                                                                United States v. Harder] (owner of U.S. corporation charged
            47     SEC enforcement actions have involved a number   for  bribes  paid  to  an  official  at  the  European  Bank  for
            of foreign  issuers.  See, e.g.,  Complaint,  SEC v.  Magyar   Reconstruction and Development), available at https://www.
            Telekom Plc., et al.,  No.  11-cv-9646  (S.D.N.Y.  Dec.  29,  2011),     justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/843621/download.
            ECF No. 1 (German and Hungarian companies), available at
            http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2011/comp22213-  53   15  U.S.C.  §  78dd-3(a).  As  discussed  above,
            co.pdf;  Complaint, SEC v.  Alcatel-Lucent,  S.A.,  No.  10-cv-  foreign companies that have securities registered in
            24620  (S.D.  Fla.  Dec.  27,  2010),  ECF  No.1  [hereinafter  SEC   the  United  States  or  that  are  required  to  file  periodic
            v. Alcatel-Lucent]  (French  company),  available at  http://  reports  with  SEC,  including  certain  foreign  companies
            www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2010/comp21795.   with  American  Depository  Receipts,  are  covered  by  the
            pdf;  Complaint,  SEC v. ABB, Ltd.,  No.  10-cv-1648  (D.D.C.   FCPA’s  anti-bribery  provisions  governing  “issuers”  under
            Sept.  29,  2010),  ECF  No.  1  [hereinafter  SEC v. ABB]  (Swiss   15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1.
            company),   available  at   http://www.sec.gov/litigation/
            complaints/2010/comp-pr2010-175.pdf;    Complaint,   54     See International Anti-Bribery and Fair Competition
            SEC v. Daimler AG,  No.  10-cv-473  (D.D.C.  Apr.  1,  2010),     Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-366, 112 Stat. 3302 (1998); 15 U.S.C.
            ECF No. 1 [hereinafter SEC v. Daimler AG] (German company),     § 78dd-3(a); see also U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal  Resource
                                                                                                                     104
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117