Page 100 - Bioterrorism

99

Just as Navy personnel are being forced to take vaccinations for human clinical trials for Vical, the
concentration camp inmates of Nazi Germany were given substances for testing by companies
like Bayer.

Members of the international crime syndicate, who have annexed high ogvernment office and who
are carrying out their criminal plans under color of their office, now want to abolish the right of
the entire nation not only to refuse but also to claim any compensation if they are injured.

What will happen when people are given a vaccine similar in lethality to the one in Poland, but
cannot claim any compensation?

When the US government forces the people of America to take an uknown vaccine for which they
are a priori banned from asking for compensation for death or injury, the government has moved
beyond equity or administrative law and into criminal law with the government acting criminally.

When an American is forced at gunpoint under criminal law to take a vaccination but are barred
from any form of legal or financial redress if they are injured or killed, then they have the same
rights as the Nazi concentration camp inmates, who were also forced to allow unknown
substances to be injected into their bloodstream at gunpoint and who were also barred from
seeking any from of redress whether in the form of financial compensation or before the law
courts because the Nazi government de facto waived their right to do so.

Furthermore, if the government absolishes the requirement to pay compensation to those injured
or killed as a result of a swine flu vaccination, then the government is telling the vaccine
companies it has a carte blanche to do what it wants. It doesn’t matter who dies or is injured as a
result of shoddy vaccines. The companies will never be held to account.

The burden of risk or debt has to be born entirely by the people while the credit or profts in the
form of revenue from sales, higher share prices and better dividends acrrue solely to the
pharmaceutical companies and the banks that hold stock.

By waiving the right of the people of America to claim any compensation and offering blanekt
immunity, companies have a financial incentive to sell as many vaccines as possible as
expensively as possible while producing them as cheaply as possible by cutting quality control
standards to maximise their companies.

Baxter, another key vaccine supplier, is currently facing lawsuits for adultering Helperin with
cheaper ingredients to maximise profits resulting in death and injury.

If this is the way, Baxter is behaving when it can still be sued for killing and injuring people by
putting in cheap and unapproved ingredients, how will it behave when it cannot be sued for
damaging vaccines?

Are the people of America going to be forced to accept into their blood an unproven, untested,
toxic drug that cost about the minimum to produce irrespective of the danger?

The principle of compensation is there to ensure equity in a transaction over the long term. A
buyer buys a product from a seller. If the product proves to be wilfully and negligently faulty, the
buyer can claim compensation. An American takes a vaccine from a manufacturer. If the vaccine
proves to be wilfully and negligent faulty and to lead to death and injury, the person can claim
compensation