Page 96 - Bioterrorism

95

Federal Law and Regulations prohibit the use of investigational new drugs, including unproven
vaccines, without informed consent of recipients 51. 10 U.S.C. § 1107 (2000) provides that
investigational new drugs or drugs unapproved for their intended uses may not be given to
members of the Armed Forces without their prior consent except in the case of a waiver by the
President of the United States. However, Presidential decrees are not mandated by the US
Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights with its democratic code.

Executive orders issued by Adolf Hitler, the de facto President of Nazi Germany (who won
democratic elections in 1933) of German citizen’s constitutional rights was not considered
adequate justification for violating those rights and the rules of normative justice by the US
Military Tribunal at the Nuremberg Trials.

Therefore, the various government agencies created by the Federal Act of 1935 also have to be
subordinated to th central overriding purpose and goals of the Preamble and Constitution,
namely Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness, irrespective of any corporate contracts.

Essential government functions, including public health functions and mass vaccination
programmes, cannot be detached by an act of "privatisation" or “corporatisation” from the
Preamble, Constitution and Law of the land and from the goals they mandate.

They cannot never legally and constitutionally be detached from or given a life independent of
the Preamble and Constitution and Law because this is the ultimate source of their authority in
the first place.

The public agencies in United States of America cannot be turned into an apparatus for killing
Americans by means of deliberately or accidentally contaminated and/or shoddily manufactured
vaccinations under any law for the enrichment of pharmaceutical companies, the banks that own
those companies or by any foreign powers that gain undue influence over the US government.

The abolition of the relationship between the Preamble and Constitution and the activities of the
government agencies under the Federal Act of 1935 is a legal fiction.

Any judge who attempts to interpret laws in a way that is not alignment with the overwhelming
intention of the Preamble, Constitution and the Bill of Rights, namely, to protect the Liberty,
Life, Happiness, including health and property of the people of America, and to hold the
government agencies, including the public health agencies, accountable for doing the same, has
failed to understand the objective, logical necessity inherent in these documents.

As mentioned, there is a precedent for making judges accountable for failing to uphold the
objective necessity of normative justice of the Preamble and Constitution and for allowing a
tyrannical government to hollow out the rights of citizens. That precedent is in the Nazi German
Judges Trial conducted by US Military Tribunals at Nuremberg in 1947 when German judges
and lawyers were held to account for their wilful, sophistic and perverse interpretation of the
German Constitution, which, like the US constitution, assigned civil rights to individuals and
limited the power of the government, thereby allowing the Nazi government to carry out the de
facto abolition of all those civic rights and government limits with a veneer of legality.

The goals laid out in the Preamble are not law, but they still have the absolute and binding
character of a law, and that binding character extends to all courts and to all government
functions, privatised or not.

The Preamble requires that the Constitution and laws and goals of courts and government
agencies are always and without exception interpreted in such a way as to contribute to the goals
laid down in the Preamble, including the continuation of the Constitution in perpetuity, so