Page 91 - Bioterrorism
P. 91
90
The Declaration states that there are "Natural" and "Divine" rights that human beings are endowed
with, and that these exist before any human laws, charters or constitutions were ever written.
These rights antedate, and therefore takes precedence over State and National laws and
Constitutions, which, to be valid, must be based on the fundamental principles of inherent human
and natural rights which are naturally and divinely and equally conferred upon all human kind.
The official title of this document is "The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of
America," which shows that it is the official statement or code of the foundation governing
principles of the New Nation issued by its first Congress and has, therefore, the full effect of a
"Constitution," "Pre-Constitution" or "Bill of Rights."
It follows that no government, no president, in spite of any self proclaimed “state emergency” – a
“state of emergency” was also the pretext that the Nazis and Nazi Judges used to destroy the
German Constitution -- or any war on terrorism or disease can ever introduce regulations or laws
that override these basic rights to life for they are anchored in foundation of the country itself, in
the Constitution and its democratic code.
The implementation of emergency health powers and martial law will mean will mean the
destruction of the Constitution and is therefore always, without exception illegal and
unconstitutional.
The courts of the United States have handed down clear judgements against forced vaccinations.
In 2004, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued a temporary injunction, saying the
Pentagon’s compulsory vaccination of military personnel against anthrax was illegal.
Until proven otherwise by the Food and Drug Administration, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G.
Sullivan in his 34-page decision agreed with the contention of unidentified active duty National
Guard and civilian defense employees that Anthrax Vaccine Absorbed was an unlicensed,
investigative drug and being used for an unapproved purpose.
So concerned was Congress about the impact of vaccines that it passed a law amid fears that the
use of such drugs may have led to unexplained illnesses among veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf
War, which have come to be known as Gulf War Syndrome.
The judgements against vaccinations go back for decades. In 1894 Judge Bartlett, of the New
York Supreme Court, in the case of Walters, decided that:
"To vaccinate a person against his will, without legal authority so to do, would be an
assault."
So, to force someone to take a vaccine against their will is itself an assault or a criminal
offence under this interpretation. If the person who is forced to take the vaccine then dies,
it flows that not an assault but a murder has been committed. And when a murder has been
committed, the US Justice system requires the perpetrators to be brought to justice even if
they are government officials or government personnel.
Judge Gaynor also of the New York Supreme Court and also in the same year, 1894, in the case of
Smith against Health Commissioner Emery of Brooklyn issued a ruling later confirmed by the
New York Court of Appeals:
"If the Commissioner [of Health] had the power to imprison an individual for refusing to
submit to vaccination, I see no reason why he should not also imprison one for refusing to
swallow a dose. But the Legislature has conferred no such power upon him, if, indeed, it