Page 94 - Bioterrorism

93

paragraphs but in conjunction with the other parts and the overriding intention expressed in the
Preamble, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, is the ultimate framework or vector for
interpreting all the other laws.

Those goals that are in conflict with the goals laid down in the Preamble are, therefore, a priori
logically and necessarily without any legal force in US law and government.

That laws when detached from a Constitution and normative justice can be administered in a
way that is unjust is shown by the developments in Nazi Germany when legal manoeuvres were
carried out to obstruct and destroy the basic purpose and provisions of the German Constitution,
manoeuvres including the privatisation or corporatisation of German government functions,
putting them into a „legal void“, referencing not the Constitution or normative justice, but the
“performance targets” of their „corporate owners.“

That it was illegal and unconstitutional for the Nazis to use the manoeuvre of corporatising
government functions and replacing laws with regulations is underlined by the judgements of the
US Military Tribunal at Nuremberg.

Under the Federal Register Act of 1935, an attempt was made to detach the operation of
government agencies from the goals laid out in the Preamble, Constitution and Code, binding by
virtue of the logical necessity inherent in the ideas expressed in these Charters on all government
activities, by assigning to those government functions the status of private corporations, and in a
way that the constitutional mandates and goals of the Preamble did not attach to them.

As a result, corporations under private law were created that appeared to be able to operated
outside the Preamble and Constitution and Bill of Rights on a technicality.

In this way, members of the international crime syndicate, who have annexed high ogvernment
office, were able to carry out their criminal plans under color of their office more easily.

The people working for the agencies were given the status of private sector employees and were
no longer public officers with an Office bound to the Preamble and Constitution.

They were employed under contracts of corporate law that made no reference to the Preamble
and Constitution, from which they derived their entire authority from in the first place.

They were given the status of simple mercenaries with some of them armed and some of them
unarmed, who worked for money and were required to perform certain duties laid down by their
employers by and through "cooperative agreements", "performance of services contracts",
"grants", "memorandums of understanding", "incentive programs" and on and on which are
controlled by the Federal government.

However, the privatisation or corporatisation of the functions of government, including public
health functions, is not logically and legally the same as the privatisation or corporatisation of
the ideas and Charters underlying a government and its functions. The Preamble and
Constitution remain the ultimate authority over these agencies because they are the original and
sole cause or authority of all government activities, including the activities of privatised public
health government agencies.

The limits of privatizing government functions and detaching them from the Constitution and
allowing them to operate as “corporations” with employees accountable to no one except to their
employer in a “law free” zone are shown by the Nuremberg Trials.