Page 93 - Bioterrorism
P. 93

92


               While the Preamble is not the Law of the Land, it has a binding character of a Law in as far as it
               sets a clear direction, goal or objective to which activities of the constituent legal and
               governmental bodies, including the public health bodies of the United States when implementing
               vaccine programmes, must align themselves in order to have any legitimate authority whatsoever
               in the first place.

               All the articles and amendments, laws and statutes must be read in conjunction with the
               constitution’s Preamble, which sets forth a normative structure in which the „general welfare“,
               „justice“, „liberty“ and domestic democracy have an inseparable relationship for „Posterity“. The
               Preamble’s normative meaning is given tangible form by the provisions in the Constitution and
               the Bill of Rights.

               The Preamble, Constitution and Law or Code or Statues are inextricably and logically connected.
               The Preamble is the authority for the Constitution. For anything to have Force and Effect it must
               have authority.  Rules are similar to Regulations, which is how the Law or Code or Statutes are
               interpreted and enforced.  The Code is the Authority for the Rules.  The Constitution is the
               Authority for the Code.  The Preamble is the Authority for the Constitution. That means that the
               Preamble is the ultimate authority for the Constitution, the Code, the Rules or Statutes.

               The Preamble can never, not in for Posterity, under any circumstances be detached from the
               Constitution and the government and its agencies cannot ever be detached from the Constitution
               and Preamble. This is because the causality between the Preamble, Constitution and Rules
               involves a logical and not a contingent necessity.

               The philosopher David Hume in his A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740) showed that the
               only necessity that links cause and effect is the logical necessity of a demonstrative argument.
               By contrast, when a sequence of events is observed in the physical world that is considered
               causal -- for example, an apple falling down from a tree onto the ground -- these are only
               impressions of the apple, its motion and its collision, but there is no logical necessity by which
               the cause brings about the effect. There might be an occasion when the apple does not fall
               downwards but upwards. We have observed apples falling to the ground every single time but
               there is no logical necessity for them to fall to the ground every single time.

               There is, however, a logical necessity that two plus two always equals four and that logical
               necessity resides in the ideas of two and two and in the idea of addition of numbers.

               Two plus two can never logically equal three.

               Hume established that there was no argument for linking causes and effects in terms of powers,
               active forces, and so on but that the only causal necessity was a logical one such as found
               inherent in the concepts of mathematics and language.

               Because the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights are artefacts of language and the words
               have logical relationships between each other that involve the idea of a necessary connection, the
               causal links between them cannot logically be broken apart.

               The Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights have the same logical relationship between them
               as two plus two plus two equals six.

               A whole can be divided into various parts just as an apple pie can be divided into slices. The
               Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights form one whole but can also be divided into parts for
               the sake of ease of use by persons seeking to apply the law to specific and concrete
               circumstances. Nevertheless, the meaning of any law is not contained in one isolated word or
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98