Page 89 - Bioterrorism

88

sanction the murder of that individual. For if a person cannot choose except between death by a
dangerous vaccine or death by a bullet, then the life of that person is being directly threatened by
an outside agent and there is way out for them except death. That person cannot resist a dangerous
vaccine by law and they cannot resist it by force.

If a government can so violate the basic freedoms of citizens of the United States as to force them
to take an untested vaccine for a “swine flu” or other pandemic, then it can force them to do
anything, such as, for example, not to drive a car, an activity which has been proven to be far
more dangerous to people’s health than the swine flu, which has killed relatively few people so far
in the USA.

On this logic, a government can force a mandatory reading program on its citizens on the grounds
that this is good for the well being of the individual and the country, and shot or imprison anyone
who does not participate without any right to compensation.

The right of the citizens of the United States to refuse a vaccination flows from the second article
of the Declaration state that "all men" are endowed by their Creator with "certain" "unalienable
rights" among which are "life" "liberty" and the "pursuit of happiness."

To force the people of America to take a dangerous vaccine which has a high possibility of
causing death and injury and so robbing them of their “life”, “liberty” and “pursuit of happiness”
is to violate their unalienable right to life, safety, liberty and happiness of the individual.

The right to "life" of course is stated first among all the rights granted by the Constitution to a
citizen of the United States of America because without life is the prerequisite of all other
activities; and the right to "liberty" is stated second, because without reasonable scope to exercise
our freedom to pursue our ideas of happiness in our own way, without infringing on the liberty or
happiness of others, we enjoy a merely nominal notion of liberty that is useless and meaningless.

The right to freedom from dangerous vaccines and other biological agents is directly covered by
the “right to life”, and is, therefore, an “unalienable right” of every American citizen today as
yesterday that no government can invade.

The government’s mandatory “swine flu” vaccine programme is, therefore, not only illegal and
unconstitutional, but it is also contrary to accepted norms of medical ethics, which reinforce the
right of a patient to decide what operation is or is not to be performed on his own body and blood,
including what vaccination to accept.

The President has no legal or constitutional right to issue decrees, executive orders or waivers that
grant him or any other body, national or international, such as the United Nations or WHO, the
right to abolish, limit or infringe on the civic rights of the citizens of the United States of America
anchored in the Constitutional Charters of the United States.

The Constitution and Bill of Rights judge any President who acts in this way, to be acting
illegally, for he is acting in opposition to the very body of laws from which he derives his own
authority. Presidential authority has no authority whatsoever when it authorises flagrant violation
of the Constitution from which that president derives authority in the first place.

As the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights makes clear, the people of United States of
America are endowed originally and inherently with all necessary or unalienable rights for life,
liberty and happiness, and their government exists simply or chiefly for the purpose of protecting
and enforcing these rights. The government cannot grant or deny its citizens rights, which exist
inalienably in the people themselves.