Page 87 - Bioterrorism

86

The Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights which are the law of the land, and from which all
government bodies derive their authority, make it clear that the citizens of the United States can
never legally and constitutionally be stripped of all their rights in the same way that the Nazi
prisoners of war were by any legislation or any Presidential executive order waiver, and they can
never be forced to take an unproven vaccine under punishment of being shot or imprisoned as
criminals and have their their right to compensation abolished by the government in advance
without their consent.

Articles IV and VIII of the Amendments are two of the articles that give the people of the United
States the legal right to refuse a vaccination or any medical experiment to be inflicted on their
bodies by force.

Article IV. 'The right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable
searches and seizures shall not be violated."

This Article makes it clear that provisions in the state and federal health emergency acts to
go into houses and seize property if people refuse to accept an unproven vaccine are
illegal.

Article VIII. "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fine's imposed, nor cruel
and unusual punishments inflicted."

Article VIII makes it clear that “cruel and unusual punishments” cannot be inflicted on the
citizens of United States, but that all punishments need to be in proportion to the offence.

The punishments envisaged for refusing a vaccine are not in proportion to the offence.

Isn’t shooting someone or imprisoning them as a criminal, as the federal government claims the
right to do under its draconian emergency health powers, because they refuse to take a dangerous
vaccine a cruel and unusual punishment, and therefore an extreme and flagrant violation of Article
VIII?

Isn’t putting someone in a “FEMA” camp for quarantine, that is to say, imprisoning them without
right to a jury, just for refusing to have an unproven vaccine injected into their body without their
consent an “excessive” and disproportionate punishment?

Isn’t abolishing the right of people to claim any compensation for any injury or damage inflicted
on them by vaccination with an unproven substance a “cruel and unusual punishment?”

Again, it is clear from the Constitution that the government is prohibited from inflicting excessive
and unreasonable punishments possible under criminal law and also military law for an action that
is a right of every citizen of the United States of America, namely the right to refuse to allow an
unknown, potentially lethal substance, to be injected into their body, and any “immunity” that the
government confers upon itself as it commits these acts is an illegal and unconstitutional
“immunity”.

It is legally unconstitutional for the government to treat its citizens, free men, women and children
and members of a free state, with rights and dignities that cannot be invaded, as "slaves," and
“prisoners” to be subjected to military despotism or arbitrary medical dictates and compelled to
take a vaccination on pain of death without recourse to the courts of law or compensation if they
are injured as a result of this compulsory vaccination giving them the same legal status as the
prisoners of the Nazi concentration camp, that is to say, no legal status and no legal rights.