Page 99 - Bioterrorism

98

Therefore, the judgement of 1905 on vaccines based on outdated science cannot be the judgement
of 2009. The courts must adjust to the new body of scientific evidence available and on the basis
of this information, they are legally and constitutionally bound to make judgements to promote
the health and well being of the American people.

XXI. The issue of immunity and compensation as evidence of intent to commit a crime

The US government has passed legislation giving them immunity in the event of vaccinations
causing death or injury, specifically by barring people from seeking compensation.

Compensating patients who are harmed as a consequence of participation in a vaccination
programme is a well established principle of US law.

The US federal government currently has a programme that gives compensation to victims of
government mandated vaccinations.

Victims of the 1976 government-mandated swine flu mass vaccination programme won more than
a billion dollars in damages for the injuries they suffered as a result of vaccines.

Compensation is a mechanism by which the vaccine companies have an incentive to act in the
interests of the people, and not manufacture products that cut costs and are dangerous.

And yet this compensation is to be waived now under The Model State Emergency Health Powers
Act, the National Emergency Act, NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL
DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51 and HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20.

So, just at the time when Americans are being asked to take upon themselves the greatest risk of a
vaccine not proven, or rather proven to have killed people in Poland, they will not be able to claim
compensation.

For the US government to force the people of America to sign away their right to compensation,
individually and collectively, for a vaccine that is classified as a bioweapon by that same
government, and which they are being compelled to take at pain of death or imprisonment while
not adequately regulating the vaccine manufacturers in spite of lapse after lapse is illegal and
unconstitutional.

For the government of the USA is not mandated by the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights
to seek the Life, Liberty and Happiness of pharmaceutical companies and the banks that hold
shares in vaccine companies by supplying them with a huge market of unwilling subjects to inject
whatever substances they chose into those people.

The government of the USA only has legitimate authority in as far as it serves the People of the
United States and their Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Such a blanket enforced waiver is illegal and unconstitituional: only the invidivual can waive their
own right to compensation and only after being adequately informed and giving their consent.

The principle that the patient must always consent of their free will to a vaccination was
established at the Nuremberg Trials when Nazi German doctors were held to account for injecting
unknown substances into Nazi concentration camp inmates.