Page 34 - The Fourth Industrial Revolution
P. 34

are fewer young adults, purchases of big-ticket items such as homes,

               furniture, cars and appliances decrease. In addition, fewer people are likely
               to take entrepreneurial risks because ageing workers tend to preserve the
               assets they need to retire comfortably rather than set up new businesses.
               This is somewhat balanced by people retiring and drawing down their

               accumulated savings, which in the aggregate lowers savings and investment
               rates.


               These habits and patterns may change of course, as ageing societies adapt,
               but the general trend is that an ageing world is destined to grow more
               slowly unless the technology revolution triggers major growth in

               productivity, defined simply as the ability to work smarter rather than
               harder.


               The fourth industrial revolution provides us with the ability to live longer,
               healthier and more active lives. As we live in a society where more than a
               quarter of the children born today in advanced economies are expected to
               live to 100, we will have to rethink issues such the working age population,
                                                              16
               retirement and individual life-planning.  The difficulty that many countries
               are showing in attempting to discuss these issues is just a further sign of
               how we are not prepared to adequately and proactively recognize the forces
               of change.


               Productivity


               Over the past decade, productivity around the world (whether measured as
               labour productivity or total-factor productivity (TFP)) has remained

               sluggish, despite the exponential growth in technological progress and
                                              17
               investments in innovation.  This most recent incarnation of the productivity
               paradox – the perceived failure of technological innovation to result in
               higher levels of productivity – is one of today’s great economic enigmas that
               predates the onset of the Great Recession, and for which there is no

               satisfactory explanation.


               Consider the US, where labour productivity grew on average 2.8 percent
               between 1947 and 1983, and 2.6 percent between 2000 and 2007, compared
                                                                18
               with 1.3 percent between 2007 and 2014.  Much of this drop is due to
               lower levels of TFP, the measure most commonly associated with the

               contribution to efficiency stemming from technology and innovation. The US
               Bureau of Labour Statistics indicates that TFP growth between 2007 and



                                                           34
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39