Page 107 - Law of Peace, Volume ,
P. 107

Pam 27-161-1

            to include all delegates, deputy delegates, advisers, technical experts and   the  United  States and  the  Government of  the  Member  concerned,
            secretaries of delegations.  53                      shall, whether residing inside or outside the headquarters district, be en-
                                                                 titled in the territory if the United States to the same privileges and im-
                (2)  Section  15 of  Article  V  of  the agreement  be-
                                                                 munities, subject to corresponding conditions and obligations, as it ac-
            tween the United Nations and the United States Regard-   cords to diplomatic envoys accredited to it. In  the case of Members
            ing the Headquarters of  the United Nations provides as   whose governments are not recognized by the United States, such privi-
            follows:                                             leges and immunities need be extended to such representatives, or per-
                                                                 sons on the staffs of such representatives, only within the headquarters
               (1)  Every person designated by a Member as the principal resident
            representative to the United Nations of such Member or as a resident   district, at their residences and offices outside the district, in transit be-
                                                                 tween the district and such residences and offices, and in transit on offi-
            representative with the rank of ambassador or minister plenipotentiary,   cial business to or from foreign countries.
               (2)  such resident members of their staffs as may be agreed upon
            between the Secretary-General, the Government of the United States   (3)  Section 7(b)  of  the International Organizations
            and the Government of the Member concerned,          Immunities Act, 54  accords  representatives  to  interna-
               (3)  every person designated by  a Member of a specialized agency,
            as defmed in Article 57, paragraph 2, of the Charter, as its principal resi-   tional organizations, as well as oficers and employees of
            dent representative, with the rank of ambassador or minister plenipo-   such organizations, immunity ". . . from suit and  legal
            tentiary, at the headquarters of such agency in the United States, and   process relating to acts performed by them in their official
               (4)  such other principal resident representatives of Members to a
            specialized agency and such resident members of  the staffs of  repre-   capacity and falling within their functions as such repre-
            sentatives of a specialized agency as may be agreed upon between the   sentatives, officers, or employees."  55
            principal executive officer of the specialized agency, the Government of
                    Section 111. IMMUNITIES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, THEIR AGENTS,
                                                OFFICIALS AND INVITEES
            5-22.  General.  a. The modem  law  relating  to  the im-   organizations require jurisdictional immunities in order to
            munities  of  international  organizations  has  developed   carry on their functions without interference from munici-
            principally from the experience of the League of Nations   pal courts and administrators. Unlike states, however, in-
            and the International Labor Organization, although some   ternational organizations do not enjoy a long history  of
            aspects of its origin can be traced back to the nineteenth   respect for their authority or the means of taking recipro-
            century. This body  of  law  began as little more than  "a   cal reprisals against infringements of that authority.
            general principle resting  on the questionable analogy of   b.  The fact that no attempt will be made in this publica-
            diplomatic immunities; it has become a complex body of   tion to fully analyze this particular aspect of jurisdictional
            rules  set  forth  in  detail  in  conventions,  agreements,   immunity is not to be viewed as an attempt to minimize
            statutes and regulations."  56 As the scope and importance   its increasing importance in  public  international law.  A
            of  the  activities of  international  organizations have  in-  detailed  examination  of  this  area  of  jurisprudence  is,
            creased in the postwar world, so have the extent and sig-   however, better suited to an advanced study of interna-
            nificance of their immunities and those of  their officials.   tional organization. For purposes of the military attorney,
           The  bases  for  these  immunities  diier  in  important   several references provide a concise and informative over-
            respects from those for the granting of jurisdictional im-   view of this topic. 57
            munities  to  foreign  states.  Like  states,  international
                      Section IY. THE GRANTING OF DIPLOMATIC ASYLUM, POLITICAL ASYLUM OR
                                                   TEMPORARY REFUGE
           5-23.  General.  Military  attorneys may  very  likely  en-   55.  On the immunities of representatives to international organiza-
           counter requests for diplomatic asyl~, politid asyl~  tions, see  generally Resmtement (Second), supra note  2  at 8  86 and
           or  temporary refuge,  either overseas or within  the ter-   Gross, Immunities and Privileges of Delegations to the United Nations,
                            df
           ritorial juri~ctio~  the  United  States.  Moreover,  a   l6   483
           mishandling of such requests may lead to serious diplo-   56.  C. Jenks, International Immunities XXXV (1961).
                                                                   57.  See W. Friedman, 0.Lissitzyn & B. Pugh,International Law at
           matic and         consequences.              it  is   725-44 (1969),  and N.  Leech, C. Oliver & J. Sweeney,  The Interna-
           necessary to examine the legal norms and DOD regula-   tional Legal System (1973) 883-928.
           tions applicable to those jurisdictional concepts.      58.  A classic example of  the serious consequences that can occur
           5-24.  ~~~li~~bl~a. Initially, it  is ~~t~~~~ti~~alL  ~  ~  .  arose of a U.S. refusal to grant asylum to a Lithunian seaman in U.S. ter-
                                                                ritorial waters in November 1970.Thii refusal, now popularly known as
                    to
           nvdistinguish between politi*        Or
                                                                The vi@ant Incident, resulted in a complete   Of  Depart-
                  and                           Or              ment of State and Department of Defense guidelines on requests for
           asylum is the term appropriately to be employed where a   immunity. These are examined in the following pages. For an excellent
           political  refugees finds  refuge  within  the  borders  of  a   discussion of the practical and legal problem involved in this incident,
                                                                see Mann, Asylum Denied: The  Vigilant Incident, 23 Naval  War  Coll.
              53.  As of January 1, 1975, 110 states had acceded to this Conven-   Rev. 4 (May, 1971) and Goldie, LegalAspects of the Refusal of Asylum
           tion.                                                by U.S. Coast Guard on 23 Nowmber 197423 Naval War Coll. Rev. 32
              54.  59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C.A.  g 288d(b).        (May, 1971).
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112