Page 41 - December 2018 | Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal
P. 41

Health                             health insurance, property insurance, basic   308 (Conn. 1947) supports the view that
            Distributions for “health” generally include   needs, modest vacations, etc. It is less clear   other resources should be considered when
            emergency medical treatment; physical and   whether  such payments  ought  to include   determining whether the HEMS standard
            psychological treatments; health, dental, and   additional luxuries and extraordinary   has been satisfied under a trust instrument,
            vision care or insurance; home healthcare;   vacations. Whether a distribution can be   whereas McClintock v. Smith, 29 N.W.2d 248
            etc. The propriety of other distributions for   made  for  “maintenance  and  support”  will   (Iowa 1947) found that other resources should
            “health” can be less clear—for example, spa   require a careful look toward the terms   not be considered in making discretionary
            or golf memberships. Even the propriety   of the trust, the settlor’s intent, and the   distribution decisions unless there is a clear
            of distributions for medical expenses can   beneficiaries’ customary standard of living.   showing of intent otherwise.
            be called into question depending upon   In Matter of Estate of McCart, 847 P.2d 184   The potential of liability for action
            the facts and circumstances. For example,   (Colo. Ct. App. 1992), a court required   or inaction puts trustees in a difficult
            in  Naughton v. First Nat’l Bank of Boston,   distributions to a beneficiary for his   position. Fortunately, trust agreements,
            356  N.E.2d  1224  (1976),  a  trustee’s  refusal   maintenance at a level consistent with the   common and statutory trust law, and courts
            to pay  the medical expenses  associated   beneficiary’s social and economic position   generally protect trustees from liability for
            with a beneficiary’s last illness that came   at the time of the creation of the trust,   the reasonable exercise of discretion for
            due  after  the  death of  the  beneficiary  was   providing for all comforts and necessities   distribution decisions under the HEMS
            determined to be an abuse of discretion.   to which he had grown accustomed. In   standard, which itself is relatively broad and
            The Court found that payments for support   contrast, in Kimball v. Reading, 31 N.H. 352   open to interpretation. Nonetheless, a trustee
            and health of the beneficiary extended past   (N.H. 1855), a court held that distributions   (or a beneficiary) should consider engaging
            his death, and the trustee breached his duty   of large sums of money for an extravagant   legal counsel whenever he, she, or it believes
            by refusing to pay for the beneficiary’s final   trip were in poor judgment and an abuse of   a discretionary distribution decision may be
            medical expenses.                  discretion because some luxuries, even if   called into question, because the governing
                                               within the beneficiary’s standard of living,   law in any given jurisdiction may give rise to
            Education                          may still be considered outside the scope of   unanticipated results.
            Distributions for “education” generally   a trust.
            include tuition for elementary, high school,
            college, trade schools, professional schools,   Consideration of Other Resources  Chad Makuch is an estate planning
            etc. In addition, distributions frequently are   A sometimes overlooked consideration   and tax lawyer at BakerHostetler
            made for room and board while enrolled in   of distributions under a HEMS standard   who focuses on counseling wealthy
            college (at least while enrolled full time).   is  a beneficiary’s  other  resources.  Where   families, institutional trustees,
            Such  distributions  for  “education”  seem   a  trustee  has information  regarding other   other fiduciaries and tax-exempt
            fairly straightforward, but there is a lot   assets available to a beneficiary, whether the   organizations. He helps families transfer assets
            of uncertainty depending, as always, on   beneficiary owns those assets or has other   and business interests to children, grandchildren
            the  applicable facts and  circumstances.   trusts established for his or her benefit,   and charities while minimizing or eliminating
            In  Lanston v. Children’s Hospital,  148F.2d   the trustee ought to consider whether   transfer taxes; counsels fiduciaries in connection
            689 (D.C. Cir. 1945), a trustee refused to   such information is relevant to his or her   with their responsibilities under complex trusts
            pay for a beneficiary’s room and board   discretion  to distribute  trust  property. This   and applicable laws; and guides public charities
            expenses between college semesters as the   determination will depend on the terms of the   and private foundations through the tax laws
            beneficiary was not actively in school at the   trust, interests of other beneficiaries (if any),   and regulations that govern them. He has been
            time. Nonetheless, the Court found that   and other relevant facts and circumstances.   a CMBA member since 2009. He can be reached
            payments for education include support   For  example,  Brennan v. Russell,  52  A.2d   at cmakuch@bakerlaw.com or (216) 861-7535.
            between  college  semesters.  In  Epstein v.
            Kuvin, 95 A.2d 753 (N.J. Super Ct. App. Div.
            1953), a trust called for the education and   Mediator/Arbitrator Ron Kopp
            support of a beneficiary. The beneficiary   Delivers Closure to Disputes
            went on to attend medical school, and the   Ron Kopp has spent over 35 years handling high-
            Court  found that  distributions  permitted   profile litigation. A past president of the Ohio State
            for education did not include tuition beyond   Bar Association, he is routinely on the list of the Top
            a four-year undergraduate institution   100 Ohio Super Lawyers, at times breaking into the
            because such postgraduate education was   Top 10. Increasingly, parties, attorneys, and judges
            outside the scope of the traditional meaning   turn to Kopp as a preferred neutral to conduct
            of education.
                                                  mediations and arbitrations of locked civil disputes.
            Maintenance and Support                                                                  Ron Kopp
            Distributions  for  “maintenance  and                          1375 East Ninth Street  th  330.849.6644
                                                                           One Cleveland Center, 10  Floor
            support” generally include housing expenses                    Cleveland, OH 44114     rkopp@ralaw.com
            (mortgages, property taxes, rent, etc.),
                                                  R&A_2018-047_Kopp_BarJournal-Ad_r2.indd   1             8/27/18   1:57 PM
            dECEMBER 2018                                                              Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal | 41
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46