Page 106 - Ming_China_Courts_and_Contacts_1400_1450 Craig lunas
P. 106

were eventually completed in 1430, and it seems that a more   In another entry, Yang offers one rare example of the
          relaxed political environment prevailed from about this   Yongle emperor defending Neo-Confucian teachings
          time, after the historical narrative of the Yongle usurpation   against critics. Aside from the formal compilations of the
          and reign was resolved.                           ‘Great Compendia’ of the Four Books, Five Classics and the
            As David Robinson has shown us (see Chapter 1 in this   Neo-Confucian writings on human nature and moral
          volume), Ming emperors actively cultivated their image,   principle, the Wujing daquan 五經大全, Sishu daquan 四書大全
          following the grammar and imagery of power that   and Xingli daquan 性理大全, the Yongle emperor and his
          predominated across much of Asia. Yang Shiqi and his peers   courtiers personally expressed few opinions on the Neo-
          played a role in this development of the martial imperial   Confucian tradition.  But in this story, the emperor is
                                                                             16
          image. They were frequently commanded by their ruler to   presented as its staunch defender. In the second year of his
          compose commemorative poems on the various hunts and   reign, 1404, an elderly minor scholar from Raozhou in
          military manoeuvres, to celebrate the martial vigour of the   Jiangxi, Zhu Jiyou 朱季友 (n.d.) presented books to the
          sovereign.                                        throne that criticised the major Song Neo-Confucian
            In the Record of Imperial Pronouncements, however, Yang   masters, Zhou Dunyi 周敦頤 (1017–73), Zhang Zai 張載
          sought to cast the court in a different light, with an emphasis   (1020–77), the Cheng brothers, Cheng Hao 程顥 (1032–85)
          on the sovereigns’ civil virtues, moral composure and   and Cheng Yi 程頤 (1033–1107), and Zhu Xi 朱熹 (1130–1200).
          personal relationships with the members of the court. Yang   According to Yang, ‘His Highness read it and reacted in
          wrote in the staid formal language of the ‘Chancellor Style’   severe anger, saying “He is a scholar-thief (ruzhizei 儒之賊)!”’
          (Taigeti 台閣體), one that he and his peers had cultivated over   The emperor then showed the writings to the others in
          the first decades of the 15th century. In poetry and in prose,   attendance. The officials condemned the work and
          this style was clear and bland, a register of language with a   recommended that the author be punished and his works
          confident vision of order, putting the world to right through   destroyed. Hu Guang noted that since the author was in his
          an idealised narrative where, as Yang says in his preface, the   70s, burning his writings might be sufficient. The emperor
          Ming throne is passed down from one sage to the next – the   then declared: ‘Slandering the former worthies and
          world as it should be.                            destroying the correct way is uncommonly criminal. By
            As one might expect, Yang himself plays a prominent role   controlling him We can set an enduring example’. Then he
          in these accounts and many of them are solitary exchanges   ordered that Zhu be returned to Raozhou and that local
          between him and the emperor. As the sole witness to these   officials there give him a beating and investigate his house to
          interactions and with so many of his colleagues from that era   ensure that all his writings were destroyed. He then said to
          dead, Yang had the liberty to reconstruct the character of   the courtiers, ‘Eliminating evil must be done thoroughly.
          the emperors and the court as he saw them. The short   Destroying his writings is truly appropriate!’ 17
          anecdotes found in the Record of Imperial Pronouncements thus   This account had already appeared in much briefer form
          offered his idealised and highly personal image of the ruler.   in the Veritable Records of the Yongle reign.  Here Yang added
                                                                                             18
          In Yang’s telling, the three emperors he served were   greater emphasis to the emperor’s indignation, indicating a
          sagacious and moral, but also intimate and highly   more personal investment in the teachings of Neo-
          deferential towards the civil officials at court.   Confucianism. And further, Yang emphasised the emperor’s
            In several of the anecdotes, Yang portrays the Yongle   deference to the advice of his officials. As this story was
          emperor and his son and grandson as deeply engaged in   buried in the non-circulating Veritable Records, Yang here
          various aspects of ‘literati’ culture. In several entries, the   retold it to promulgate the image of an emperor fully
          emperor exchanges comments on the classical heritage with   committed to the teachings and counsel of his civil official.
          Yang and others. These discussions are not particularly deep   Throughout Yang’s collected records, the emperors are
          or profound: in one, Yongle insists that these scholars verify   depicted as showing careful deference and solicitude towards
                                                      14
          their claims on the dao 道 with passages from the classics.    their officials. The relationships are shown to be personal
          The point is not to show the emperor’s scholarly prowess, but   and intimate. This is particularly clear in one entry in which
          simply his familiarity with and deference to the Neo-  a member of court died suddenly:
          Confucian corpus and the literary traditions of his courtiers.   In June of the sixth year of Yongle [1408], the Minister of Rites,
          Elsewhere, Yang recorded another exchange with Yongle’s   Zheng Ci 鄭賜, died. Before this, his duties in the Rites
          son, Hongxi, focused on the literature of Ouyang Xiu, the   Ministry had been many. Ci confided to his vice minister, Zhao
          prominent Song litterateur who came from Luling 盧陵, in   Gong 趙羾, that he was anxious and ill. Frequently while
          Jiangxi province, also Yang Shiqi’s home. Ouyang was widely   memorialising at court, he would lose track and the emperor
          considered to be the paragon of fine literary writing and Yang   disliked it.
          was one of his chief proponents. Here, he records the Hongxi   That morning, the death was urgently announced. The Hanlin
          emperor praising both his literary style and his moral   officials were summoned and [His Highness] asked, ‘We had
          rectitude: ‘Writing that is not based on the correct way, this is   not heard that Ci was ill, how could he have lost his life?’ Before
          useless writing. An official who is unable to speak directly is a   any of them answered, I approached and said, ‘I observed that
          disloyal official. Ouyang is truly a credit to Luling as a   Ci had been ill for several days. But he was afraid and did not
          gentleman. Shiqi, you should so strive!’  Taught by Yang   dare to retire, which would have been better so that he could
                                        15
                                                               seek medical care. Yesterday evening, I was standing with Ci
          Shiqi in his minority, the Hongxi emperor here perfectly   outside the Youshun Gate, and his physical strength was so
          recites his teacher’s point of view, a clear articulation of the   impaired that he fell to the ground. Those around were startled
          principles behind the ‘Chancellery literary style’.   that from his mouth and nose, the air was exhaled, but not


          96 | Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111