Page 196 - Ming_China_Courts_and_Contacts_1400_1450 Craig lunas
P. 196

Plate 20.9 Competition for state
                                                                                  resources in China 1400–33

          undoubtedly merited ‘fast-track’ priority on resources, not   remarkable, in particular the use of lobed ogee arches. These
          least because its progress would have been conspicuously   are not unique in China. There are other examples including
          visible on the city roofline from the imperial palace.   another site in Nanjing, the Linggusi temple, where a fireproof
          However, there were distractions, many of which certainly   sutra repository of revolutionary design had already been
          commanded higher priority, and this is best seen as a   completed in 1381 (Pl. 20.10a–b). However, these arch forms
          timeline (Pl. 20.9), which indicates how various projects of   are not Chinese. They are seen in various locations stretching
          national importance were simultaneously inter-linked   across Central Asia to the Near East and into Western
          financially and hence capable of creating immovable   Europe. Many of these date from the late Yuan or early Ming
          blockages for important but lesser local projects such as this   (contemporaneous with the Late Gothic in Europe).
          pagoda. The ‘northern’ projects around Beijing, the Grand   The porcelain cladding is an obviously unique quality,
          Canal and the repeated Mongolian campaigns would   and the Da Baoen Monastery Pagoda has an ingenious
          ultimately continue until Yongle’s death, and were matched   solution for a challenging design requirement, but the
          in the south by equally costly ‘foreign policy’ targets such as   broader question concerns the use of keys and tenons for
          the Annam campaign and Zheng He’s expeditionary   fixing such parts. Curiously, the cladding solution adopted
          voyages.                                          for the Da Baoen Monastery Pagoda was very different
                                                            from the applied brickwork used by the builders of the ‘Iron
          Some important but still outstanding questions    Pagoda’ (Tieta 鐵塔) at Youguosi 佑國寺 (Protecting the
          I would like finally to list various questions for which there   State Monastery), Kaifeng 開封, nearly 400 years earlier.
          are presently no ready answers, some of which link with   Keys and tenons that would normally be cut in stone are
          ongoing studies on cultural transmission.         foreign to Chinese building traditions of timber-frame
                                             36
            We do not know who designed the pagoda.  Whilst in   structures, movable partitions and brickwork in-fill. The
          many respects its conceptual design follows conventional   use of ceramic masonry keys in China is rare but not
          preceding forms, there are elements of its detailing which are   unique, but none matches in boldness and quality the

























                                                      Plate 20.10a–b: a) (above) Detail of reconstruction of lobed ogee arch
                                                      surround from Da Baoen Monastery Pagoda in the Nanjing Museum; b) (left)
                                                      Lobed ogee arch of Wuliangdian 無梁殿 (Beamless Hall) at Linggusi 靈谷寺
                                                      (Numinous Valley Monastery), Nanjing







          186 | Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201