Page 201 - A Re-examination of Late Qing Dynasty Porcelain, 1850-1920 THESIS
P. 201
David’s objects have recorded places of manufacture, patronage, or connection to the
imperial family. For example, Sir Percival purchased approximately 50 ceramics directly
from the Yuin Yeh Bank in 1927 that went on to be major components of his Chinese
porcelain collection. 262 As established earlier, this bank acquired major assets directly
from the imperial holdings of Empress Dowager Cixi. 263 In this regard, it is clear that Sir
Percival David had direct contact with objects that were not only part of the imperial
collection but had been particularly selected by Cixi. As a result, portions of Sir Percival
David’s collection had a clear provenance back to Cixi, identifying them as
representative of her personal aesthetic, which proved to be the major inspiration for the
imperial styles of the late Qing era.
Within the Sir Percival David collection, the object with the strongest connection
to Cixi’s porcelain is a small dayazhai marked bowl (Figure 76). The exterior of the
vessel is detailed with a yellow enamel ground that is unevenly applied, appearing lighter
on one side and slightly deeper toned on the other side of the body. The mouthrim and
footrim have remnants of ornate gilding that has worn over time. Overglaze grisaille
enamel forms a bird and flower motif, featuring a small magpie along with interwoven
wisteria and peonies. The design exhibited appears reminiscent of earlier porcelain
associated with Cixi’s patronage (Figures 16, 68) unifying these examples to form a
distinct expression of the porcelain of Cixi’s era. The shared style found on all three
spring dayazhai bowls resulted in clear continuation of a bird and flower motif within
Cixi’s patronage. Utilizing nearly identical imagery, forms, enamel colors, and
262 Chiang, “Redefining an Imperial Collection: Problems of Modern Impositions and
Interpretations,” 17. This bank was also referred to previously in the chapter of the Empress
Dowager.
263 Hua-Tien, “An Interview with Lady David,” 56.
162