Page 75 - A Re-examination of Late Qing Dynasty Porcelain, 1850-1920 THESIS
P. 75

time, much less the operation of the imperial porcelain factories.  Even though the

                   imperial porcelains were produced with their marks, any innovations came from the


                                                                                          67
                   Empress Dowager, who ruled in both the political and domestic spheres.”   The
                   emperors’ lack of involvement in the patronage of porcelain indicates that Cixi herself


                   was the force behind porcelain production during the late Qing dynasty.

                          Along with the reign marks that she utilized while acting as regent for the


                   emperors, Cixi had multiple personal reign marks including several that reference palaces

                   such as chuxiugong zhi 儲秀宮製 (Palace of gathering elegance) that she resided in


                   within the Forbidden City.  The most well-known of these marks is dayazhai, or “abode

                                       68
                   of great refinement.”   This is a critical element to consider, because each reign mark

                   indicates that Cixi alone was the patron approving the porcelain.  This was a drastic


                   progression within the field of patronage, because the laws of the time would have

                   prohibited anyone other than the emperor from having “imperial wares.”  The use of

                   these unique reign marks that were not the emperors’ nianhao allowed Cixi to bend the


                   legal requirements.  Despite being somewhat different than the emperors’ reign marks,

                   she managed to create her own nianhao on the porcelain, establishing herself not only as


                   a major patron of the arts but also as the imperial center of China.  The imperial kilns also

                   produced porcelain using the reign marks of the emperors that Cixi oversaw as regent,


                   but it is evident that Cixi’s was the distinct aesthetic taste behind the styles being

                   produced whether the porcelain displayed her reign mark or the reign mark of the current


                   67  Ronald W. Longsdorf, “Dayazhai Ware: Porcelains of the Empress Dowager,” Orientations 23,
                   no. 3 (1992): 45–56.
                   68  For a list of reign marks see Appendix B.





                                                             36
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80