Page 35 - Decorative Arts, Part II: Far Eastern Ceramics and Paintings, Persian and Indian Rugs and Carpets
P. 35

The evidence of the inscriptions cited above suggests that the overglaze famille  rose painting on the inte-
              riors  of  the  "ruby-back"  dishes  of  the  Yongzheng  and  Qianlong  periods  was  executed  in  Canton  and  not  at
              Jingdezhen  or  Beijing.  The  decoration  on  many  "ruby-back"  dishes  also  resembles  motifs  found  on  Canton
              enamels on metal. It is likely, however, that these dishes were first manufactured at Jingdezhen and then  shipped
              to Canton  to be decorated. The superb calligraphy of the Qianlong  seal script mark on the dish in France, which
              is stylistically identical  to  seal script marks on the best Qianlong blue-and-white and enameled  porcelains  made
              and decorated  at Jingdezhen, supports this hypothesis. 46
                     The "ruby-back"  family  of  dishes  appears  to  have  largely disappeared  by the  mid-eighteenth  century
              (the  reason  is unknown),  although  both  the  ruby-colored  monochrome  glaze  and  the  overglaze famille  rose
              palette persisted as modes  of decoration  through  the late eighteenth  and nineteenth  centuries.
                     The story of Chinese ceramics is one of astonishing longevity and great technological  sophistication.  In
              it are mirrored  developments  in  Chinese  social, political,  and  economic  history  that  are key to  understanding
              why certain  techniques,  shapes, and  decorative  motifs appeared  when  they  did. While  the  majority  of  Chinese
              ceramics  are  utilitarian  in  nature,  they  are  enormously  valuable  for  the  ways  in  which  they  reflect  multiple
              dimensions  of China's  rich and complex history and geography. A full understanding  of Chinese ceramics neces-
              sitates  an understanding  of ceramic  technology,  particularly  the technology  of kilns and glazing. It is hoped that
              this  introduction  to  Chinese  ceramic  techniques  and  the  catalogue  will  make  the  aesthetic  experience  of  the
              National  Gallery's  collection  more  meaningful.
                                                                                                SL/JK/JO

              NOTES
              1.  Proto-porcelain is a term  currently  favored by many Chinese  ceramic historians  over the  more  familiar term stoneware. It
              acknowledges the link between the early earthenware and the later porcelains (now known  to have been first made in the seventh
              century A.D. rather than  the eighth as often  cited). Abundant  analyses of sherds from  wares of the first millennium  B.C. have been
              conducted  in China  (at such places as the Shanghai Silicates Research Institute of the Academia Sinicia) in recent years to prove
              that the Chinese scholars are justified  in adopting the term. The term was first  used by Berthold Laufer, at the Field Museum,
              Chicago, when he theorized that Chinese hard  glazing was an outgrowth  of soft  glazing, but  archaeology in China  has proved  the
              converse to be truth. However, what he did "discover" was that there must be some sort of link between the pottery traditions  and
              the porcelain traditions.
              2.  Wood  1988,10, 57.
              3.  Recent studies  reveal that  the  composition  of porcelain  in China varied  over time  and  region. See Valenstein  1989, 312; Li and
              Zhang 1986, 217-236.  See also Yap and  Hua  1992,1488-1494.
              4.  Li 1985,135-162.
              5.  The first porcelain imported  to the West from  China represented a technically advanced  stage and was both  white and  translu-
              cent. These naturally became the Western criteria for porcelain.
              6.  Chinese "soft  paste" and  European "soft  paste" should  not  be confused. Medley (1976, 259) explains, "The  Chinese material is a
              natural white-firing  clay, probably of the pegmatite group of clay minerals. The Chinese call it hua-shih, 'slippery stone,' and  it was
              sometimes added to poor  quality porcelain, perhaps for its plastic quality. The European soft  paste is a fritware  and thus  artificially
              constituted  of a glass frit  combined  with ball clay. The Chinese material in the fired  state is rarely translucent, while the European
              type usually  is."
              7.  Wood  1988,10.
              8.  Kerr  1986, 41.
              9.  Wood  1985-1986,  41.
              10. Underglaze cobalt was also generally used to inscribe reignmarks on Chinese ceramics. The use of reignmarks (nianhao)  was
              rare before the fifteenth  century (early Ming dynasty), although they are occasionally found either incised into the clay body (for
              example  on tenth-century  Yue wares) or inscribed  with a brush  in ink (as on Song-dynasty Yaozhou celadons).  From the reign of







                                                                   C E R A M I C  T E C H N I Q U E S
                                                                                                         19
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40