Page 149 - C.T. Loo A paper about his impact and activities in the Chinese art Market
P. 149

149

                                                                                       309
                       contextual and formal approaches in his dealing in ancient bronzes.  In the folder, two

                       types of materials complemented each other. The first type of materials focused on the

                       vessel’s shape, decorative motif, symbolism. It included references to the scholarship of


                       the leading Western experts, including Alan Priest, Bernhard Karlgren, Alfred Salmony,

                       W.P. Yetts. There was not much information about its dating because the author noted


                       that the decoration on the vessel did not fit into the typological system that Karlgren

                              310
                       created.  The second kind of materials exemplified Chinese methods, which

                       emphasized the importance of inscription, historical relevance, and native literature. Each

                       character in the inscriptions was transcribed and translated into modern Chinese and


                       English (Fig. 46). The English translation of the entire inscription was annotated to

                                                                            311
                       illustrate its historical relevance, dating, and references.  Based on the inscription, the
                       vessel was dated to the reign of Zhou wu wang, the King of Wu in the Zhou dynasty


                       (1134-1120 BCE) (Fig. 47). The provenance of the vessel was traced based on native

                       evidence such as the record in Xi qing gu jian, and two collector seals on the rubbing


                       included in Lo Zhengyu’s publication San dai ji jin wen cun. 312  The materials inferred

                       that the vessel passed from the imperial collection to the famous Chinese antiquarian Pan








                       309
                          The bronze vessel was inventoried in May 1939, and left by C. T. Loo on approval at
                       A. Pillsbury in November 1939, and sold to him in May 1940 for $3,000 (Inventory card
                       86420, FCA; Yellow folder, 86420, the second drawer (without label) from the top on the
                       far right, FCA).
                       310  Bernhard Karlgren,“Yin and Chou in Chinese Bronzes,” Bulletin of the Museum of
                       Far Eastern Antiquities, No. 8 (1936): 9-154.
                       311
                          In the 1930s and 1940s, the inscription on ancient assumed an added meaning because
                       of the rising nationalism in China. See Chapter Four, pp.164-5.
                       312  A letter from an unidentified person to C. T. Loo, December 20, 1939, FCA.
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154