Page 179 - C.T. Loo A paper about his impact and activities in the Chinese art Market
P. 179
179
demonstrated his scientific attitude. In the catalogue Exhibition of Chinese, Indian and
Cambodian Art Formed by C. T. Loo, Loo noted, “At the beginning, the dynastic periods
are given in a table which may serve for reference in respect of attribution noted in the
list…Every effort has been made to date the objects with care and conservatism.” (Loo
1931, 3-4) Loo’s exhibitions were often presented as Chinese art history in miniature.
The review of Loo’s 1936 exhibition inaugurating his new galleries observed, “In the
exhibition examples from the Han through the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
reiterate the artistic development of the ten centuries.” (Davidson 1936, 12) Loo’s 1940
Exhibition of Chinese Stone Sculptures was also noted for its comprehensiveness, art
historical approach, and authority. Salmony, who compiled the 1940 exhibition
catalogue, compared this exhibition to Osvald Siren’s authoritative work Chinese
Sculpture Chinese Sculpture from the Fifth to the Fourteenth Century (1925), “The
exhibition at the gallery of C. T. Loo and Company, New York is equally comprehensive
by illustrating each creative stage of the evolution of Chinese stone sculpture by one or
more important examples.” (Salmony 1940a, Introduction)
Considering Loo’s close connection to high officials in the Guomindang government
in China, Loo’s display of Chinese antiquities can be seen as part of the Chinese
374
nationalistic campaign to construct a grand and coherent narrative of China’s past. Loo
often presented his collection as the spokesman of ancient Chinese civilization. In the
1931 catalogue for the Exhibition of Chinese, Indian and Cambodian Art, Loo stated,
“The great span of years covered by our exhibits clearly manifests the fulfillment of our

