Page 180 - C.T. Loo A paper about his impact and activities in the Chinese art Market
P. 180

180

                       desire to represent comprehensively the products of Chinese civilization.” (Loo 1931, 3-


                       4) During 1935-6, Loo not only contributed important loans to the International

                       Exhibition of Chinese Art but also launched a satellite show at John Sparks in London,


                       which, in content and concept, mirrored the Chinese government’s archaeological

                       collection in the International Exhibition of Chinese Art. Some items on display in Loo’s


                       satellite exhibition were thus described: “…coming possibly rather within the category of

                       archaeology than of fine art, but nevertheless of great interest, are some fragments of


                       carved bones, dating from approximately 1500 B.C.” 375

                           The rising nationalism in China not only resulted in a surge of interest in the study and


                       display of Chinese antiquities, but also in the Chinese government’s tightened control

                       over the export of Chinese art. In 1929 Wu Chao-Chu from Chinese Legation

                       Washington voiced his concern about the outflow of Chinese antiquities, “…the Chinese


                       people are gratified that their art has in recent years received due recognition in Europe

                       and America, even though, as you say, the zeal to collect has in some instances outrun


                       discretion… The productions of genius are the common possession of mankind, and

                       Nationalistic China has no intention of adopting a dog-in-the-manager policy. At the


                       same time, it would be a reflection on the Chinese people if the collections of their art in

                       foreign countries should excel those in their own possession.” (March 1929a, 28) He


                       further announced,  “The Legislative Council is …even now engaged in considering a

                       law dealing with the export of archaeological and artistic objects, probably somewhat on


                       the lines of similar laws in other countries.” (March 1929a, 28) In the 1930s, the Chinese




                       375  “Chinese Art in Mount Street,” Connoisseur, Vol. 97, No. 413 (January, 1936): 48.
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185