Page 58 - Sothebys HK Dragon Emperor April 2024
P. 58

ELEGANCE OF CHENGHUA IMPERIAL
             PORCELAIN PAINTING


             Dragons, as mythical animals, leave artists in theory total   mature style of decoration and the highest quality, by
             freedom of interpretation, but in China, their physique has   far. The square reign mark is found on the most exquisite
             always been quite strictly defined. The various species that   Chenghua pieces, particularly on doucai porcelains and
             exist, are clearly differentiated and the present creatures,   copies of Song Ru and guan wares.
             with only two legs, a small body and a dramatic scrolling   Only two complete companion pieces to the present bowl
             tail, are kui (or xiangcao, ‘sweet grass’) dragons. Kui are the   appear to be recorded, one in the Palace Museum, Taipei,
             dragons associated with Tibetan Buddhist contexts and are   illustrated in Chenghua ciqi tezhan tulu/Catalogue of the
             depicted in Buddhist architecture and on objects used in   Special Exhibition of Ch’eng-hua Porcelain Ware, 1465-
             Buddhist ceremonies. They have developed from the Indian   1487, Palace Museum, Taipei, 2003, no. 18; the other in
             makara, a water-guardian spirit used particularly as an   the Shanghai Museum, published in Lu Minghua, Shanghai
             architectural element to protect gateways. In Tibet, makaras   Bowuguan zangpin yanjiu daxi/Studies of the Shanghai
             formed an integral part of arch-like structures – derived   Museum Collections : A Series of Monographs. Mingdai
             from the Indian torana gateways – that were used to frame   guanyao ciqi [Ming imperial porcelain], Shanghai, 2007,
             Buddhist figures both in three- and two-dimensional images.  no. 3-60. A partially preserved bowl, reconstructed from
             As Tibetan Buddhist iconography became influential in the   sherds recovered from the waste heaps of the imperial kilns
             Yuan dynasty (1271-1368), such gateways incorporating a   at Jingdezhen, is illustrated in Mingdai Chenghua yuyao ciqi,
             pair of makaras were in China adopted for religious buildings.   op.cit., vol. 1, no. 56; see also Julian Thompson, ‘Towards
             An early example is the Cloud Terrace on the Juyongguan   a Catalogue Raisonné of Chenghua Porcelain’, in Regina
             mountain pass of the Great Wall, outside Beijing. This   Krahl, ed., The Emperor’s broken china. Reconstructing
             platform, which originally supported three white dagobas   Chenghua porcelain, London, 1995, p. 118, where this pattern
             and was completed in 1345, is carved with Tibetan Buddhist   is recorded as B10.
             imagery and inscribed with sutra texts. The arch-shaped   In his discussion of the Shanghai companion bowl, Lu
             reliefs around its passageway show the classic composition   Minghua (op.cit., p. 137) has remarked upon the exquisite
             that is also seen in the Ming period: a garuda between two   painting manner here adopted. With outlines drawn with a
             spirit figures, or apsaras, at the top, a pair of makaras with   very fine brush, and filled in with a wide range of different
             curling tails at the shoulders, and a sequence of animals,   tones of cobalt blue, the painting manner achieves a new
             placed above each other, along the jambs of the arch.  level of excellence. Lu characterizes this painting style
             The Chenghua Emperor was a fervent sponsor of Buddhist   with the term fenshui, which can perhaps be translated as
             (as well as Daoist) causes, who himself dressed as a monk   ‘diluting with water’, and describes washes of different,
             during Buddhist ceremonies held at court. In the second year   carefully distinguished cobalt-blue tints, created by mixing
             of his reign, he agreed to have a new temple built, Cirensi,   the pigment with different amounts of water. Rather than
             at the site of the Baoguosi in Beijing, where his mother’s   being due to the haphazard variation in tone that occurs
             younger brother (or cousin, according to some reports) had   naturally when painting in ink – or here cobalt – of only
             been made abbot. A commemorative text that the Emperor   one tone, several different pigment solutions were here
             wrote on the construction of this temple, preserved on a   methodically employed.
             stone stele that still stands in the temple grounds, attests to   How these Chenghua imperial pieces, inscribed with the
             his personal attention to this project.    reign mark, stand out in quality becomes very clear when
             Another, more important temple structure erected under   comparing them with roughly contemporary porcelains
             the Chenghua Emperor, in 1473, is the Zhenjuesi (‘Temple   with kui dragons, but unmarked: Related, but much less
             of True Awakening’), better known as Wutasi (‘Five Pagoda   carefully painted kui dragons appear on the outside of an
             Temple’), built in the Tibetan style with five pagodas on   unmarked dish in the Palace Museum, Beijing, as well as on
             top of a cubical base. The main entrance to the building is   a fragmentary counterpart excavated at Jingdezhen, both
             surrounded by an arch of the same composition as that on   decorated with a double Vajra in the centre and attributed to
             Juyongguan, with two makara dragons on either side at the   the Chenghua reign, illustrated in Mingdai Chenghua yuyao
             top (fig. 1).                              ciqi. Jingdezhen yuyao yizhi chutu yu Gugong Bowuyuan cang
             According to Fang Chaoying, “More Buddhist temples seem   chuanshi ciqi duibi /Imperial Porcelains from the Reign of
             to have been built or rebuilt in Peking during the Ch’eng-hua   Chenghua in the Ming Dynasty. A Comparison of Porcelains
             and Wan-li reigns than in other periods of the Ming dynasty.”   from the Imperial Kiln Site at Jingdezhen and the Imperial
             (L. Carrington Goodrich and Chaoying Fang, eds, Dictionary   Collection of the Palace Museum, Beijing, 2016, vol. 1, nos 25
             of Ming Biography 1368 – 1644, New York and London:   and 45; another variant of the kui dragon, with paws instead
             Columbia University Press, 1976, vol. 1, p. 303). Buddhist   of claws, also not comparable in its painting style, appears
             motifs such as the Eight Buddhist Emblems, double Vajra   in the centre and around the outside of a stem bowl in the
             and inscriptions in the Tibetan script, are well known on   Palace Museum, Beijing, also unmarked and attributed to the
             Chenghua imperial porcelains and their appearance seems   Chenghua reign, ibid., no. 82.
             to have increased in the later years of the reign, but this   On porcelain, kui dragons are known at least since the Yongle
             makara-style dragon with a lotus spray in its mouth was very   period, as seen on a large jar sold in these rooms, 29th
             rarely depicted. Liu Xinyuan, who excavated the Chenghua   April 2022, lot 5, from the collection of Joseph Lau, and on
             remains at the imperial kiln site, suggested that “objects   another, of Xuande mark and period, sold 2nd October 2017,
             decorated with religious motifs were made in and after the   lot 101. In both cases, the dragons have more distinctive
             17th year of the Chenghua reign (1481), when the court was   wings – which on the present bowl are reduced to small curls
             consumed with religious activities” (A Legacy of Chenghua:   – and the Xuande version comes with paws. Kui dragons with
             Imperial Porcelain of the Chenghua Reign Excavated from   prominent wings and scaly fish tails appear quite frequently
             Zhushan, Jingdezhen, Tsui Museum of Art, Hong Kong, 1993,   on Xuande and Interregnum period porcelains, where they
             p. 29 Chinese, p. 70 English).             are often included among groups of fanciful sea creatures,
             A date in the later years of the Chenghua period is also   which include winged horses, elephants, hares and fish, so
             suggested by this bowl’s square reign mark. The porcelain   called because they are depicted among waves, in spite
             production of the Chenghua reign can be divided into three   of their wings. They are all very different from the elegant
             periods, of which the last is characterized by the most   creatures depicted on the present bowl.
              54     FOR COMPLETE CATALOGUING  詳盡圖錄內容請瀏覽  SOTHEBYS.COM/HK1526                                                                                                                                                          55
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63