Page 194 - The colours of each piece: production and consumption of Chinese enamelled porcelain, c.1728-c.1780
P. 194

CHAPTER  5  Porcelain  Trade  at  Canton  1740-1760


                            We  need  to  consider  the  factors  from  China’s  perspective.  Unlike  present


                        scholarship, this research thus considers the porcelain trade within a Chinese historical

                        context. I shall argue that the fluctuation of the porcelain trade was greatly affected


                        not only by the political events that took place in Europe, but also by other factors

                        from China’s side.




                                1200000

                                1000000


                                 800000

                                 600000
                                                                                       Enamelled
                                                                                       B&W
                                 400000

                                 200000


                                      0
                                        1740 1742 1744 1746 1748 1750 1752 1755 1758 1760


                            Figure 5-1 Quantities of imported porcelain by the VOC and the EEIC, 1740-1760. (in
                            pieces). Source: Appendix B.




                            The  large  quantity  of  blue  and  white  trade  was  certainly  affected  by  the

                        production  at  Jingdezhen,  and  the  production  was  affected  by  many  factors. The


                        production and export of porcelain at Jingdezhen were dictated by market forces since

                        the Song-Yuan period. Porcelain kilns in Jingdezhen have been identified as private

                        enterprises, and they were trade and profit-oriented, and much of the operation was


                                                               12
                        almost certainly geared towards exports.   Yet this claim was not applicable in the





                        12   Deng  Gang,  Maritime  sector,  institutions  and  sea  power  of  premodern  China  (Westport:
                        Conn.1999), pp.60-61.
                                                                                                      178
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199