Page 204 - The colours of each piece: production and consumption of Chinese enamelled porcelain, c.1728-c.1780
P. 204

CHAPTER  5  Porcelain  Trade  at  Canton  1740-1760


                                                                                             29
                        advanced age, and others by children even so young as six or seven year.’   Similarly,

                        Chinese textural records believed the production of enamelled porcelain at Canton

                        was derived from the late Qianlong reign, and flourished during the early nineteenth


                               30
                        century.
                            Moreover,  the  quality  of  the  paintings  of  enamelled  porcelain  prior  to  1760

                        suggests  that  both  the  porcelain  and  the  enamel  painting  were  produced  in


                                   31
                        Jingdezhen.   In terms of private trade of armorial porcelain, there is a contradiction
                        concerning  mistakes  in  private  orders.  Certain  errors  were  found  in  the  specially


                        ordered armorial porcelain, such as superimposing one coat of arms on another, crests

                        facing in the wrong direction, painting the coat of arms in wrong colours, depicting


                                      32
                        lions as tigers.   If porcelain was enamelled at Canton, it would be rejected if it was
                        painted incorrectly.


                            Nonetheless,  there are some objects  that required particular  attention, as they

                        were used to prove that Canton could enamel porcelain at the time. (Figure 5-3 and


                        Figure 5-4) Bushell has noticed that a piece of enamelled porcelain was signed with

                        the inscription of artist’s seal ‘white stone’ (白石) and ‘painted by painters in Canton’


                                                                                               33
                        (岭南绘者) and attempted to prove that the artist’s atelier was in the city.   (Figure

                        5-3) Similar objects  can be found in  the  Rijksmuseum  collection, one small  vase

                        decorated with a court lady playing a game (Figure 5-4) and one pair of cups and




                        29   Alfred Spencer (ed.,), Memoirs of William Hickey 1749-1775, vol. 1 (London: Hurst & Blackett,
                        Ltd.,  1913),  p.210;  https://archive.org/details/memoirsofwilliam015028mbp,  Accessed  on  14
                        February 2016.
                        30   Ji Yuansou, TaoYa [The elegance of porcelain], vol.2 (Beijing, 1918).
                        31   Rose Kerr, Chinese Ceramics: Porcelain of the Qing Dynasty, 1644-1911 (V&A Publication:
                        London, 1986), p.30.
                        32 For examples of mistakes, C. J. A. Jörg, (ed.), Chinese Export Porcelain: Chine de Commande
                        from the Royal Museums of Art and History in Brussels (Hong Kong: Urban Council, 1989), pp.
                        236–37
                        33   Bushell, Chinese Art, p.40.
                                                                                                      188
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209