Page 80 - Chinese Porcelain Vol II, Galland
P. 80

KANG-HE.
            298
            and  glaze, being just  as in the latter  productions,  so  probably
            is not older than about the twentieth  year  of this  reign,  for
           these  empty rings  are some  guide  to its  age.  Marryat,  at  p.
                                                "
                        from Stanislas Julien                  these
            209, quoting                   says,  Unfortunately
            dates           which were continued  for more than  six
                  (nien-hao),
            centuries, were  suppressed by  order of the  prefect  of the dis-
            trict of  King-te-tchin, who, in 1677, prohibited  the  inscription
            of the names of the     or the       of
                             periods      history   great men, under
            the        that  if the        were broken, the  emperor
               pretext            porcelain
            designated by  the  period,  and the  holy persons represented  in
            the  paintings,  would  undergo  a kind of  profanation."  Dr.
            Bushell and Mr.             this           did not
                           Hippisley say     prohibition       long
            remain in force, and seem to have no doubt that  up  to this
            time no marks  except  the nien-hao had been used, so that
            when we find a  piece  with two  empty rings,  the leaf or other
            mark, we  may  feel sure that it dates from 1677 or thereafter.
            When the  prohibition  was removed  is not known; however,
            the new marks  certainly  continued to be used  by  outside
            factories, if not at the  Imperial works, as  they appear  on  quite
            modern  pieces, as, for instance, the two  rings  on No. 375, but,
            as in that case, the mark  probably  is intended to be in  keeping
            with the decoration which, on the  plate  referred to, is a  copy
            of the  Kang-he  famille verte.  Nor have we  any guarantee
            that  pieces  were  always  marked before 1677, or that when the
            two blue  rings  were made the nien-hao was  invariably  filled in,
            but still it is a  great help  if we  may  take it for certain that
            the leaf and other than date marks were not used before 1677,
            and         observations would seem to bear out the correct-
               certainly
            ness of the statement.
               Archaic  drawing  must not be taken as  any  indication of
            age.  True, in this instance, it  may  be  by  some old artist who
            could not  go  with the times, but we find the same  thing crop
            up right  down the series, when the most  probable explanation
            is that the      have been decorated in imitation of some
                      pieces
            old
               painting.
               "
                Merely represent  ladies  playing  chess and musical instru-
            ments."
               In No. 517  a blue and white dish (diameter, 15 inches
                                                                  ;
            height, 2J inches)  we have what  might  be taken as an  early
                   The basket of flowers and the
            piece.                           general decoration have
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85