Page 83 - Chinese Porcelain Vol II, Galland
P. 83

VANDYKE PATTERN.                    299

     an old look, but the mark  a leaf in two blue  rings  places
     it after 1677, and the  quality  in all  respects appears  to  justify
     the date the mark would seem to indicate.
        As a later        of first half of     blue and white,
                  specimen             Kang-he
     we  may  take No. 518.  This dish  (diameter,  15 inches  ; height,
     2f inches; mark, lotus in two blue  rings)  is decorated in
     what is known either as the Persian or  Vandyke style.  With
     regard  to this, Mr. C. F. Bell writes as follows  :
        "
          I now come to the        of the                   I
                           question       Vandyke pattern.
     speak  with the utmost deference to  , but I should much
     like to know  upon  what  grounds  he attributes the  origin  of
     this     to the Persians, though  it was, of course, used
         style                                          freely
     during  the seventeenth and  eighteenth  centuries  by  them and
     by  all who derived artistic motives from Mohammedan sources.
         "
          The  steps  of  development,  whencesover  they come, are
      clearly  :
         "
          1.  Triangular  or  lancet-shaped tongues attached to the
     metal  binding  of wooden vessels  (constructed upon  tub  prin-
            to secure the nails with which it is fastened on.
      ciples)
         "
          2. The decoration of these  tongues  with the  veining  of a
      leaf, for which the resemblance of the outlines seems to call.
      Sometimes, in China, as  frequently  in the west, a rude face
      suggested  itself as  appropriate  decoration.
         "3. The modification of the outline of the  tongues  to a
      form           to that  of the
           analogous                joo-e head, which  is  itself
                derived from, or influenced
      apparently                        by (through what course
      a  profound knowledge  of Chinese ritual and folk-lore could
      alone, I  suppose, determine),  the bat form  full.
         "
          4. At this  stage  the scheme of ornament becomes  frankly
      unconstructional  its  origin being forgotten  and what was
      the border is  conveyed bodily  into the middle of the  piece,  as
      in  your  No. 230.
         "
          The  origin  and  meaning  of the  joo-e  head  is the  point
      which wants  investigating, together  with  the source of the
                   admiration  whether          or  not  in
      extraordinary                    religious           its
             shown    so      Oriental nations for that
      origin       by   many                         particular
      class of contrasted  ogival  curves or  something  which  they  once
      represented.
         "
           I do not think that  it would  nowadays  be considered
      wise  to  pit any  historical  speculation  whatsoever  against
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88