Page 217 - Made For Trade Chinese Export Paintings In Dutch Collections
P. 217

96 pag:Opmaak 1
                                                18-10-2016  15:41  Pagina 24
           roos boek 193-288 d


                                       prowess, but rather their transcultural features,  presentation, where they serve increasingly to
                                       as a result of increased EurAsian cultural  illustrate ethnographic and historical pheno-
                                       connectivity, plus their strong narrative aspects  mena. 89  They are noteworthy, not only for their
                                       that ensure the artistic value we need to  artistry, but in particular for the story they tell
                                       empower them with.                         us about the system responsible for their
                                         Having said that, looking at this group of  creation, the individuals responsible for their
                                       paintings, neither the capacity, nor       exchange, and the institutions responsible for
                                       representations that claim to be truthful or real,  their preservation. In other words: they are a
                                       counts when value accruement is at issue. I agree  material resource that is both an integral part
                                       with Graeber’s idea that “the specific history  of human heritage and central to understanding
                     216               accumulated by an object in its production,  a specific time in history.
                                       exchange and consumption in some way is      As is generally known, most attempts to
                                       crucial to its value.” 86  He argues, “it is prior  categorise material culture are bound to fail.
                                       human actions that are in some sense congealed  However, nowadays, the problem of classifying
                                       in objects that make them valuable. Thus it is  objects in museum collections has become
                                       action itself which is the source of value, even if  important again, since many curators, as Ter
                                       people do not recognize it as such.” 87  I also  Keurs notes with concern, are struggling with
                                       took this ‘action of exchange’ regarding the  the development of thesauri for handling
                                       social life of the studied group as a starting point  computerised collections. 90  In general, I agree
                                       for my research. The agency of this group as  with Ter Keurs that material culture is a valuable
                                       ‘cast-offs’ and the awareness of their significance  entry point into culture. Likewise, language,
                                       made me act. The decision either to take action  social structure, politics and norms and values
                                       or not to take action is crucial for the future of  prevailing in a society can be considered as
                                       these Tartarian winter views. Yet, it is what is  legitimate starting points for research into a
                                       done with these paintings, rather than their  culture. 91  But can we discover any key values of
                                       inherent meaning, that gives them significance.  Chinese (or Western) society condensed in these
                                       These paintings, therefore, as Nicolas Thomas  winter views? The paintings alone do not speak
                                       posits in his influential work Entangled Objects,  a language that answers our questions. They
                                       “are not what they were made to be, but what  cannot be considered sufficient for extracting
                                       they have become.” 88  This group of winter  relevant information from or about Chinese or
                                       views possess a range of material qualities, but it  Dutch culture. And, as said before, museum
                                       is only when someone uses the paintings in such  collections are limited sources for understanding
                                       a way that those qualities with connected  cultures. The paintings referred to in this
                                       meanings are switched on that they become  research patiently await their turn in the
                                       significant and valuable. Until then, these  storeroom. Currently, they are not on display
                                       qualities are latent and invisible. In anticipating  and are not accessible by the public. This fixed
                                       future policy and the attitude of Museum   and static status does not do justice to the way
                                       Volkenkunde towards these paintings, it is  in which they were used in their life, in the
                                       important to know how their materiality    heyday of production and consumption in the
                                       intervenes with this museum’s collection. In  nineteenth century. Contemporary users today,
                                       particular, this museum context contributes to  combined with current uses, are invested with
                                       the interpretation and assignment of meaning to  the power to generate change and bring the
                                       them, as these aspects come into being in  paintings back to the exchange-chain again.
                                       interaction with the viewer and the researcher.  Competent museum workers are, like
                                       Especially in the context of ethnological  Haselberger’s message recalled by Ter Keurs,
                                       museums in the twenty-first century, which “are  primarily interested in collecting and
                                       more apt to deploy narrative and ‘experience’  documenting as much information as possible to
                                       to stimulate the transfer of knowledge,” these  secure solid evidence, records for generations to
                                       paintings should be at the heart of a      come. 92  Such documentation is valuable, but

                                       ---
                                       86 Graeber 2002, quoted in Sutton 2004, 374.
                                       87 Ibid., 375.
                                       88 Thomas 1991, 4.
                                       89 Ter Horst 2012, 36.
                                       90 Ter Keurs 2006, 87.
                                       91  Ibid., 202.
                                       92 Ibid., 203.
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222