Page 44 - Made For Trade Chinese Export Paintings In Dutch Collections
P. 44

18-10-2016  21:07  Pagina 43
                               64 pag:Opmaak 1
           roos boek 001-064 f


                    the end of their use value? Do people create  constructed objects may produce certain
                    value based on imagined futures, or also on  psychological effects, including the attribution of
                    imagined pasts? The various biographical details  value as “the enchantment of technology.” 27  In
                    reveal a tangled mass of judgements about use  doing so, objects are designed to elicit a certain
                    value that shape our attitudes to these paintings.  psychological effect by exploiting certain sensory
                    Similar questions may be asked on a larger scale  characteristics. In this formulation of material
                    to determine the social history of a class of  ‘performance’, I argue, in tandem with Gell’s
                    things. This refers to a long-term view of how  idea, that human engagement with material
                    the meanings and uses of a painting change over  culture also lends Chinese export paintings
                    time. As Charles Orser Jr. wrote in 1996: “[I]n a  agency. Another mode for identifying value is to
                    cultural biography, a particular object is  determine the performance characteristics, i.e.      43
                    followed through time, with its changing context  how well the object can be used to achieve the
                    noted at each stage of its life. The social history  purpose of its use, relative to objects of a similar
                    of things focuses on the large-scale dynamics of  type. For example, a large Chinese export oil
                    supply, demand, and meanings of whole classes  painting serves a different purpose from a small,
                    of items and tracks their changes through time.” 25  loose sheet of pith paper with a watercolour on
                    The sum of many of these cultural biographies  it. This is ultimately reflected in its value and
                    forms the social history of the class of Chinese  price. The value of the huge panoramic
                    export paintings. As will be shown in chapter 5,  Leembruggen View of the waterfront of Canton
                    this history, in turn, affects the cultural biography  painting may be ascribed value by society at
                    of them: a circular ‘chicken-and-egg’ process.  large at the time of its production, while the
                                                              value of a watercolour on pith paper may be
                    Commodification: Exchange as source of value  passionately personal. The value of both
                    The commodity candidacy, the second aspect of  paintings, I argue, is inseparable from their
                    commodity-hood, is less a temporal than a  material existence, which is always substantive.
                    conceptual feature. It refers to standards and  We must bear in mind that, in the case of
                    criteria that define the exchangeability of an  Chinese export painting, the intercultural
                    object in any particular social and historical  exchange is characterised by different standards
                    context. Furthermore, the ‘candidacy’ affects,  of value. We cannot maintain the idea that it is
                    as Fridberg argues, “the ability of an object to  just the cultural framework that defines the
                    operate as a commodity in a certain situation  commodity value of these paintings. The degree
                    in line with the needs and desires of buyer and  of value coherence between, for instance, buyers
                    seller, the cultural framework in which the  and sellers varied considerably. In the
                    exchange takes place, and other situational  Netherlands at that time, Chinese export
                    factors.” 26  In the Dutch situation, with a lot of  paintings belonged to one or more external,
                    Chinese export paintings living their overlooked  globally circulating classification that was
                    lives in museum storerooms, removed from  imposed on owning such an artwork. In most
                    circulation, this candidacy aspect gives a  respects, the classification by Western merchants
                    promising perspective. Yet, it also presents the  differs markedly, we can presume, from the
                    possibility that the involved paintings can always  classification applied by the Chinese painters
                    regain their exchange value and function as  who produced them. It is therefore preferable to
                    artistic commodities. How an object came to  follow Appadurai and use the term ‘regimes of
                    hold a particular value depends on the specifics  value’, which does not imply that every act of
                    of its creation, use and ultimate value. For  commodity exchange presupposes a complete
                    example, the degree of rarity of a product, the  cultural sharing of assumptions. 28  Using this
                    level of expertise required to create an object, or  term, we can consistently work with both a very
                    the transformative processes involved in creation  high and a very low sharing of standards by the
                    may provide clues to value. The British social  actors involved in this particular sector of trade.
                    anthropologist Alfred Gell, whose most      The production process of these paintings was
                    influential work concerned art, language,  an intentional, productive action, with a certain
                    symbolism, ritual and agency, even refers to the  goal in mind. This process required a set of
                    way in which beautifully made or skilfully  material processes in which painters had to

                    ---
                    25 Orser 1996, quoted in Fridberg 2008 (online article, n.p.).
                    26 Fridberg 2008.
                    27 Gell 1994, 43-44.
                    28 Appadurai 1986, 15.
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49