Page 140 - DUOKOPT BIBLIOBOOK
P. 140

DUOKOPT  - bibliography book - CONFIDENTIAL - document for exclusive use by personnel of Laboratoires Théa – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE
                 ®









                Acta Ophthalmologica 2010


                haemorrhages  (Leske  et al.  2007;  As OBF changes are associated  to collect a sufficiently large target
                Drance et al. 2001), retrobulbar blood  with  progression  of  glaucomatous  sample.
                flow changes (Galassi et al. 2003; Sa-  damage (Galassi et al. 2003; Satilmis  All patients had been previously
                tilmis et al. 2003; Martinez & Sanchez  et al. 2003; Martinez & Sanchez 2005;  treated  with  beta-blockers  (for
                2005; Zeitz et al. 2006) and low perfu-  Zeitz et al. 2006), it is conceivable that  ‡ 6 months) and showed mean IOP
                sion pressure (Leske et al. 2007) have  an increase in OBF may protect  values ‡ 20 mmHg.
                also been found to be significant risk  against glaucomatous VF deteriora-  The study protocol was approved
                factors for glaucomatous VF progres-  tion.                 by the local ethics committee. All
                sion.                           This hypothesis was suggested in a  patients were fully informed about the
                 Although the role of IOP reduction  recently published paper by our group  details of the study protocol. Written
                in preventing VF deterioration has  (Martinez & Sanchez 2008a), which  informed consent was obtained from
                been established in randomized clini-  reported that dorzolamide 2% added  all subjects at the beginning of the
                cal trials (AGIS 2000; Gordon et al.  to timolol 0.5%, each given twice  study in accordance with the Declara-
                2002; Leske et al. 2003, 2007; EGPS  daily, may prevent VF deterioration  tion of Helsinki.
                Group 2007), many patients have  over a period of 4 years in individuals  All participants were required to
                continued to progress despite normali-  with primary open-angle glaucoma  meet the following inclusion criteria:
                zation of their IOP.          (POAG).                       age ‡ 40 years; clinical diagnosis of
                 Many different drugs used for the  The primary aim of this study was  POAG; mean diurnal IOP at screen-
                treatment of glaucoma have been  to identify clinically relevant risk fac-  ing ‡ 20 mmHg under treatment with
                shown to be effective in lowering  tors for progressive VF loss in this  beta-blockers  (for  ‡ 6 months)  as
                IOP. Among these, topical carbonic  group of patients with POAG. Base-  monotherapy; mean diurnal IOP at
                anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) have been  line and follow-up progression factors  baseline ‡ 20 mmHg under treatment
                routinely used as concomitant medica-  were separately evaluated. The sec-  with timolol 0.5% b.i.d. as monother-
                tions.                        ondary aim was to estimate and eval-  apy; early VF defect; willingness to
                 Dorzolamide was the first topical  uate the magnitude of the treatment  comply with the investigator’s and
                CAI with a significant IOP-lowering  effect (topical dorzolamide 2% and  protocol  indications;  visual  acuity
                activity to become available on the  brinzolamide 1%, both added to timo-  ‡ 0.3 (logarithm of the minimum
                market. Clinical studies in humans  lol 0.5%) by comparing progression  angle resolution [logMAR]), and an
                have suggested that dorzolamide 2%,  rates in both study groups.  equivalent spherical refractive error
                used as monotherapy or as adjunctive                        between  + 3.00 D  and  ) 6.00 D.
                therapy to timolol, is well tolerated  Materials and Methods  Patients were excluded by: any form
                and has a good IOP-lowering profile                          of glaucoma other than POAG; previ-
                (Strahlman  et al.  1995;  Adamsons  Study design           ous treatment with argon laser trabe-
                et al. 1998; Boyle et al. 1998; Cli-                        culoplasty  and ⁄ or  ocular  filtering
                neschmidt et al. 1998; Sugrue 2000;  A randomized, evaluator-masked, par-  surgery; diabetes; history of progres-
                EGPS Group 2005; Ozturk et al.  allel group design was used. Patients  sive retinal or optic nerve disease of
                2007). Previous evidence has shown  received either dorzolamide 2% or  any cause; asthma or any other
                the ocular haemodynamic effects of  brinzolamide 1%, each added to timo-  obstructive pulmonary disease, and
                topically applied dorzolamide (Marti-  lol maleate 0.5%, b.i.d. (administered  pregnancy or lactation.
                nez et al. 1999; Avunduk et al. 2001;  separately rather than as a fixed-dose  Although subjects with systemic
                Galassi et al. 2002; Januleviciene ¨ et al.  combination) for 5 years.  hypertension or cardiovascular disease
                2004; Fuchsja ¨ ger-Mayrl et al. 2005;  Unmasked staff were responsible  were not excluded, patients receiving
                Martinez  &  Sanchez  2006,  2007,  for  dispensing  study  medication,  systemic medications affecting IOP or
                2008a), although not all studies have  whereas masked staff performed all  systemic blood pressure were ineligible
                reported a positive outcome (Grun-  study-related examinations.  unless  medication  dosages  had
                wald et al. 1997; Pillunat et al. 1999;  Patients and unmasked staff were  remained stable for ‡ 6 months prior
                Bergstrand et al. 2002). Brinzolamide,  instructed not to reveal study drug  to the screening visit.
                another topically active CAI, became  assignments to the masked evaluator.
                available in the USA in 1998 and in                         Definitions
                many European countries in 1999.  Patient recruitment
                 Different authors have assessed the                        Glaucoma was defined as either a VF
                efficacy and safety of brinzolamide  The study was conducted on consecu-  defect or as glaucomatous changes in
                in clinical studies and have sug-  tive referred or recruited patients who  the optic nerve head.
                gested that the compound has good  met inclusion and exclusion criteria,  For glaucoma diagnosis, VF exam-
                IOP-lowering activity (Silver 1998;  seen at the outpatient clinic of the  inations were performed using the
                March & Ochsner 2000; Shall et al.  Ophthalmology Department (Public  24-2 full-threshold strategy on the
                2000).                        Foundation Barbanza Hospital, asso-  Humphrey VF analyser. Glaucoma-
                 Relatively few studies have evalu-  ciated with the Galician Institute of  tous VF defects were defined as
                ated the effect of topical brinzolamide  Ophthalmology [Instituto Galego de  follows: a minimum of one location in
                on  ocular  blood  flow  (OBF)  in  Oftalmoloxia], Spain) from January  the paracentral or nasal step regions
                glaucoma patients (Kaup et al. 2004;  1999 to December 2001. A 3-year  corresponding to sectors 1 or 2, or to
                Siesky et al. 2008).          recruitment period was used in order  the inferior 3 location in sector 3 of


                542
   140
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145