Page 149 - Building Digital Libraries
P. 149

CHAPTER 6








































            FIGURE 6.8
            METS with Dublin Core Example



                                                      Figure 6.8 illustrates a very basic METS document that is used at
                                                   Oregon State University (OSU) for archiving structural information about
                                                   digitized text. In this example, one can see that OSU has chosen to utilize
                                                   Dublin Core, rather than MODS, for embedding its bibliographic descrip-
                                                   tive data. This decision was made primarily due to the fact that OSU utilizes
                                                   DSpace, which stores metadata in Dublin Core. In the interest of repurpos-
                                                   ing metadata, Dublin Core was chosen as the descriptive metadata language.
                                                   However, this example demonstrates the flexibility of the METS container.
                                                   While METS was developed in concert with MODS, its greatest strength lies
                                                   in its ability to accommodate a descriptive metadata format—allowing users
                                                   to take advantage of the METS framework while still utilizing the metadata
                                                   schema best suited for their materials or infrastructure. The Library of Con-
                                                   gress provides access to a number of additional METS example documents
                                                   at its METS home page (www.loc.gov/mets).


                                                   importing Digital Objects
                                                   As a transmission format, METS has provided digital repository designers
                                                   with a simple structure that can be supported to facilitate the batch import
                                                   of digital objects. For systems that do not natively support METS, batch
                                                   importing tends to be done using simple tab-delimited files for flat objects
                                                   or the file system to preserve document hierarchy. However, this type of
            134
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154