Page 13 - GLNG Week 38
P. 13

GLNG                                             EUROPE                                               GLNG






























                         40% by 2030. Parliament will next negotiate with  and hydrogen will become increasingly the “real-
                         member states on what final shape the legislation  istic” options further ahead.
                         takes.                                 New research by classification society DNV
                           An Aframax tanker could be saddled with an  GL agrees that while LNG will play a large role
                         extra $4,000 per day in costs to meet ETS criteria,  in reaching nearer-term goals, cleaner alterna-
                         investment firm Clarksons Platou Securities has  tives will win out in the end. It sees ammonia and
                         estimated. This figure assumes fuel consump-  methanol dominating the market by 2050. But
                         tion of 40 tonnes per year (tpy), emissions of 3.1  hydrogen is not expected to see much use at all.
                         tonnes of CO2 per tonne of fuel, and an emis-  In its Maritime Forecast to 2050, published
                         sions certificate price of €30 per tonne. This extra  on September 22, DNV GL conceded that it was
                         cost would be significant for shipowners trading  difficult to identify clear winners among the
                         on the spot market, as overall operating costs for  many fuel options shipowners face. However, it
                         an Aframax carrier are approximately $6,700 per  sees fossil fuel-based LNG gaining a significant
                         day.                                 market share until regulations become stricter in
                           What is uncertain is whether the ETS will  2030 or 2040. By 2050, e-ammonia, blue ammo-
                         apply to a whole voyage to the EU or just the part  nia and bio-methanol will emerge as the victors.
                         of it in European waters. Uncertainty about how   However, DNV GL said there would be
                         the emissions trading system will be applied to  relatively limited uptake of hydrogen as a ship
                         shipping has contributed to weaker vessel orders,  fuel, because of both the fuel cost and the cost
                         Clarksons said.                      of developing engine and fuel systems. But
                           “A wait-and-see attitude has developed in  hydrogen will have a use in producing other
                         recent years but the Commission’s plans seem  carbon-neutral fuels such as e-ammonia, blue
                         likely to accelerate decision making” on which  ammonia and e-methanol.
                                                                “The grand challenge of our time is finding
        MEPS also want   propulsion technologies and fuels are adopted,   a pathway towards decarbonisation,” DNV GL
                         it said.
       to see shipowners                                      CEO Knut Orbeck-Nilssen said in a statement.
          commit to      Future fuels                         “Reducing GHG emissions is rapidly becom-
                                                              ing the defining decision-making factor for the
                         Shipowners have chosen various ways of meet-
         lowering their   ing the new IMO requirements. Some have  future of the shipping industry. The pressure to
                                                              act decisively is mounting. Perfect is the enemy
                         invested in scrubbers, which strip sulphur parti-
          annual CO2     cles from ships’ exhaust smoke, while others have  of good, and so we mustn’t wait for an ideal solu-
                         switched from high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) to  tion to arrive and risk making no progress at all.”
        emissions by at   low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO).          This said, “picking the wrong solution can
                           An alternative is using LNG as fuel, whose  lead to a significant competitive disadvantage,”
         least 40% by    advocates say not only easily clears IMO stand-  the report’s authors warned. “Planning for fuel
            2030.        ards but is also cost-competitive. The fuel emits  flexibility could ease the transition and minimise
                         virtually no SOX or particulate matter, and 85%  the risk of investing in stranded assets.”
                         less NOX than HSFO. It also produces 25% less   DNV GL added that the uptake of car-
                         CO2.                                 bon-neutral fuels will not be possible without
                           Hydrogen, methanol and ammonia offer  a “clear and robust regulatory framework,”
                         other alternatives, especially when they are pro-  which is not yet in place. “To drive the develop-
                         duced using renewable energy. But they are yet to  ment of new technologies, the framework must
                         be proved as commercially viable, available and  ensure global availability of large volumes of
                         scalable.                            carbon-neutral fuels; enable their safe use; and
                           Clarksons sees LNG serving as only a “transi-  incentivise their uptake while retaining a lev-
                         tion fuel” over the next decade, while ammonia  el-playing field,” the report said.™



       Week 38   25•September•2020              www. NEWSBASE .com                                             P13
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18